Abstract

Several information systems and computer-mediated communication studies in the literature measure user's perceptions of E-mail. The user's perceptions of E-mail were used to develop and validate the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). While a user's perceptions of E-mail play an important role in the literature, very few studies have focused solely on developing a construct for measuring these perceptions. In this paper, we develop a construct to measure an individual's perceptions of E-mail as a medium for electronic communication in organizations. Using a survey of management and nonmanagement employees in northeastern USA, we empirically test our theoretical construct. The results of our research indicate that an individual's perceptions of E-mail are a multidimensional construct with two dimensions: the individual level dimension and the organizational level. At an individual level, a person's perceptions may be impacted by E-mail's role in improving productivity, supporting team work, and providing global reach. At an organizational level a person's perceptions may be impacted by E-mail's role in making an organization vulnerable to viruses, exposing proprietary information, and/or encouraging unprofessional and illegal behavior.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2004-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2004.828211
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 39 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0099
  2. 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00012-0
  3. 10.1080/07421222.1993.11518013
  4. 10.1109/HICSS.1995.375711
  5. 10.1080/09537329608524250
  6. 10.4135/9781483325385.n6
  7. 10.2307/249008
  8. 10.1287/isre.5.1.23
  9. 10.2307/249720
  10. 10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  11. 10.2307/249348
  12. 10.2307/249154
  13. 10.1287/mnsc.27.7.757
  14. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00368.x
  15. 10.1016/0378-7206(83)90034-4
  16. 10.1080/07421222.1991.11517909
  17. 10.1080/07421222.1990.11517899
  18. 10.1016/0378-7206(90)90065-P
  19. 10.1145/105783.105793
  20. 10.2307/249135
  21. 10.1080/07421222.1990.11517882
  22. 10.2307/248682
  23. 10.1145/500286.500305
  24. 10.2307/249762
  25. 10.2307/249417
  26. 10.1109/17.846784
  27. 10.1177/0893318998113004
  28. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01321.x
  29. 10.1145/219663.219679
  30. 10.1201/1078/43183.15.1.19980101/31101.6
  31. 10.1023/A:1006110324652
  32. 10.1080/13600869855478
  33. 10.1145/293411.293425
  34. 10.1016/S0020-0255(99)00109-7
  35. 10.1109/FIE.2000.896668
  36. 10.1177/002224377901600110
  37. 10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00051-5
  38. 10.1007/BF02294359
  39. 10.1007/BF02294361