How an author can avoid the pitfalls of practical ethics

Abstract

It is pointed out that an author's violations of ethics can be intentional or unintentional. Sometimes the sins of the pen (or keyboard) creep unawares into a manuscript, only to emerge after publication as awkward ethical problems for the writer. An author can violate accepted standards of practical ethics in several ways. For example, he might run afoul of moral ethics, by misrepresenting facts; professional ethics, by omitting credit to peer's contributions; or legal ethics, by violating copyright laws. Examples show how such indiscretions can damage the author's professional reputation.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
1990-06-01
DOI
10.1109/47.56367
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (12) · 2 in this index

  1. 10.5840/bpej1981116
  2. To Engineer is Human
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Guide To Technical and Scientific Communication
  5. Constructive ambiguity: The new road to prestige in science and engineering
    Tech Commun
Show all 12 →
  1. 10.1109/IPCC.1989.102107
  2. Technical communicators and moral ethics
    Tech Commun
  3. More on the ethics of scientific publication
    Current Contents
  4. STC and the professional ethic
    Tech Commun
  5. 10.1177/016224398000500403
  6. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  7. Technical Communication and Ethics