The theory and lessons of stop discourse
Abstract
The technical report and proposal are strategic documents that must cogently define, rationalize, and sell their high-technology products in the world of competitive procurement. Because these documents are created by group authorship, there is a need to coordinate the multiple engineer-authors, provide them with strategy information, and help them develop arguments that justify their design approaches. Conventional methods of subject outlining, trial-and-error writing, and post-manuscript reviewing do not cope with these needs. The Stop (Sequential Thematic Organization of Proposals) technique applies five principles to solve this problem: It (1) recognizes the passage unit of discourse to gain expository-descriptive coherence; (2) uses the essay (with thesis sentence) to enhance strategic discussion; (3) restricts outlining to establishing topical architecture and introduces prewriting (via storyboards) to discover and exercise argument, explanation, and visualization; (4) uses pre-reviewing (via real-time, walk-through group dynamics) to permit team/corporate review of the story plan prior to manuscript drafting; and (5) stresses group writing to infuse both the marketing and the technical strategy and design approach into the document. Twenty years of applying STOP has shown it to be a thoroughly practical system, even though intellectually demanding and unforgiving of lazy writing. This paper reviews the principles, practices (including misconceptions), and lessons of STOP as developed, refined, and learned during those years.
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
- Published
- 1983-06-01
- DOI
- 10.1109/tpc.1983.6448686
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (1)
-
Tracey (1992)IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Journal of Academic Writing Dec 2020Collaborating between Writing and STEM: Teaching Disciplinary Genres, Researching Disciplinary Interventions, and Engaging Science Audiences ↗Rachel C Riedner; Bill Briscoe; Alexander Van der Horst; Carol Hayes; Gary White
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Dec 2025Design Thinking in Business and Professional Communication Pedagogy: A Review of Pedagogical Studies, 2014–2024 ↗Jason Tham
-
Written Communication Apr 2025Reflections-on-Action: Using Critical Disability Studies to Reconceptualize the Net Work of Social Work Students in Interprofessional Simulations ↗Melissa Guadrón
-
Res Rhetorica Mar 2025Jacek Wasilewski; Agata Kostrzewa
-
Journal of Business and Technical Communication Jan 2025Revisiting Four Conversations in Technical and Professional Writing Scholarship to Frame Conversations About Artificial Intelligence ↗Bill Hart-Davidson; Michael Ristich; Casey McArdle; Liza Potts