Abstract

This article demonstrates how an analysis of the net work of medical social work students in an interprofessional Standardized Patient Program (i.e., healthcare simulation) reveals the productive potential of a Critical Disability Studies orientation to writing studies and workplace research. Standardized Patient Programs were created as a method for uniformly assessing healthcare students’ interpersonal interactions with patients. In practice, they evolved to additionally standardize the professional attitudes and behaviors of students. Structured around three emergent claims, this article uses novel and established technical-rhetorical concepts to unpack how social work students comprehend and navigate issues of power, collaboration, and knowledge exchange within a Standardized Patient Program. And when these claims are further analyzed through a Critical Disability Studies lens, they reveal how disability-related disruptions can constructively challenge medicalized stances toward disability as well as understandings of collaborative labor, workplace/simulation-based writing, and professional discourse.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241303919
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. Barney K. W. (2017). Disability simulations: Using the social model of disability to update an experiential e…
  2. Bennet K. C. (2022). Prioritizing access as a social justice concern: Advocating for ableism studies and disa…
  3. 10.7551/mitpress/13785.001.0001
  4. Bogo M. Katz E. Regehr C. Logie C. Mylopoulos M. Tufford L. (2013). Toward understanding meta-competence: An …
  5. Bogo M. Regehr C. Woodford M. Hughes J. Power R. Regehr G. (2006). Beyond competencies: Field instructors’ de…
  6. Campbell L. Angeli E. (2019). Embodied healthcare intuition: A taxonomy of sensory cues used by healthcare pr…
  7. Carney T. Bigby C. Then S. Smith E. Wiesel I. Douglas J. (2023). Paternalism to empowerment: All in the eye o…
  8. Chávez K. R. (2011). Counter-public enclaves and understanding the function of rhetoric in social movement co…
  9. Craig S. L. Muskat B. (2013). Bouncers brokers and glue: The self-described roles of social workers in urban …
  10. Harden R. M. Stevenson M. Downie W. W. Wilson G. M. (1975). Assessment of clinical competence using objective…
  11. Harris A. (2011). In a moment of mismatch: Overseas doctors’ adjustments in new hospital environments. Sociol…
  12. Kourgiantakis T. Sewell K. M. Hu R. Logan J. Bogo M. (2020). Simulation in social work education: A scoping r…
  13. Maier J. T. (2021). Addiction is a disability and why it matters. Neuroethics 14 467-477. https://doi.org/10.…
  14. 10.7551/mitpress/11765.001.0001
  15. Press S. (2022). The politics of standardized patienthood. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine 5(3) 308-334. http…
  16. Rosell D. R. Futterman S. E. McMaster A. Siever L. J. (2014). Schizotypal personality disorder: A current rev…
  17. 10.4324/9780203640098
  18. Schryer C. F. Lingard L. Spafford M. M. (2005). Techne or artful science and the genre of case presentations …
  19. 10.3998/mpub.309723
  20. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  21. 10.1145/1166324.1166336
  22. 10.7208/chicago/9780226180458.001.0001
  23. Wahab S. (2005). Motivational interviewing and social work practice. Journal of Social Work 5(1) 45-60. https…
  24. Wheeler S. K. (2018). Harry potter and the first order of business: Using simulation to teach social justice …
  25. 10.4135/9781446218570
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →