Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Introduction:</b> This experiential teaching case study calls for technical and professional communicators to apply a combination of ableism studies and disability justice in examining their participation in potentially ableist, normative systems. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Situating the case:</b> Previous technical and professional communication (TPC) scholarship has demonstrated how the field of disability studies (DS) furthers TPC's goals of social justice, but it has not offered methods to trace the systemic ableist assumptions that contribute to disability's marginalization. I thus extend these considerations through attention to disability justice and ableism studies. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">About the case:</b> This teaching case evaluates my attempt to incorporate DS into my Writing for the Professions class by examining the warrants or assumptions reflected in class materials and student discussions to determine how DS's inclusion in the course impacted such warrants. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methods/approach:</b> I used thematic coding to analyze class documents, student work, and semistructured student interviews and traced how reflected warrants contributed to understandings of ability and disability. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results/discussion:</b> I found that analyzed documents predominantly relied on ableist warrants that obscured disability's relationality, positioned disability as deviance, limited efforts towards social change, and disregarded disability's intersectional complexity. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion:</b> To counter the use of ableist warrants that impede social justice goals, I recommend that TPC instructors foster critical understandings of systemic ableism by applying disability justice principles to their course materials. Through a combination of ableism studies and disability justice, TPC can pursue more socially just documentation practices.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2022-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3140570
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (12)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 12 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4324/9780429198748
  2. 10.7330/9781607327585.c003
  3. Ablest Rhetoric: How We Know, Value, and See Disability
  4. 10.1111/hypa.12127
  5. 10.1057/9780230245181
  6. 10.7330/9781607327585.c007
  7. 10.7330/9781607327585.c005
  8. 10.7330/9781607327585.c001
  9. 10.7330/9781607327585.c008
  10. 10.7330/9781607327585.c010
  11. 10.2190/RAAC4
  12. 10.4324/9781003320609-37
  13. 10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3871
  14. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01206.x
  15. 10.1080/13691180600751348
  16. 10.2307/j.ctv11314kc
  17. 10.7330/9781607327585.c009
  18. 10.18061/dsq.v31i3.1680
  19. 10.3998/mpub.9708722
  20. 10.3998/mpub.1612837
  21. 10.1353/wsq.2018.0003