Creative Obfuscation
J. Scott Armstrong
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
A rational and popular viewpoint is that the function of scientific writing is to communicate knowledge. A study of prominent journals, however, suggests that clear communication is not appreciated within the reading-writing-refereeing community. If clarity is a goal for a journal, the editor must take action.
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
- Published
- 1982-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1109/tpc.1982.6447741
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Green
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Journal of Writing Research Jun 2023Cross-disciplinary language changes in 4th graders as a predictor of the quality of written scientific explanation ↗A. Meneses; M. Montenegro; D. Acevedo; J. Figueroa; E. Hugo
-
Journal of Academic Writing Jul 2021Justin Nicholes
-
Research in the Teaching of English May 2014On the Instability of Disciplinary Style: Common and Conflicting Metaphors and Practices in Text, Talk, and Gesture ↗Andrea R. Olinger
-
Written Communication Jan 2010Sheryl Honig
-
Technical Communication Quarterly Apr 2007Jean Lutz; Mary Fuller