Creative Obfuscation
J. Scott Armstrong
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
A rational and popular viewpoint is that the function of scientific writing is to communicate knowledge. A study of prominent journals, however, suggests that clear communication is not appreciated within the reading-writing-refereeing community. If clarity is a goal for a journal, the editor must take action.
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
- Published
- 1982-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1109/tpc.1982.6447741
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Green
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Journal of Writing Research Jun 2023Cross-disciplinary language changes in 4th graders as a predictor of the quality of written scientific explanation ↗A. Meneses; M. Montenegro; D. Acevedo; J. Figueroa; E. Hugo
-
Journal of Academic Writing Jul 2021Justin Nicholes
-
Research in the Teaching of English May 2014On the Instability of Disciplinary Style: Common and Conflicting Metaphors and Practices in Text, Talk, and Gesture ↗Andrea R. Olinger
-
Written Communication Jan 2010Sheryl Honig
-
Technical Communication Quarterly Apr 2007Jean Lutz; Mary Fuller