Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted a renewed interest in intergenerational letter and email writing. Evidence shows that expressive writing, including letter writing, has a number of benefits including improved literacy and perceived well-being, and it can also facilitate a deep connection with another person. This scoping review provides an overview of the existing research on letter and email writing between different age cohorts. Of the 471 articles retrieved from Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, and Web of Science, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised and synthesized in this review. The studies were grouped into two themes according to their stated aims and outcomes: (a) studies exploring changes in perceptions, and (b) studies relating to skills development and bonds. The results showed a range of benefits for intergenerational letter writers, from more positive perceptions of the other age group, through improved writing skills and subject knowledge, to forming intergenerational memories and bonds. The review also highlights some of the limitations of the current research and formulates recommendations for future studies in the fields of writing studies, intergenerational research, and educational gerontology.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2024-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883231207103
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication
Also cites 66 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  2. 10.1080/03601270050200662
  3. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00250.x
  4. 10.18546/RFA.03.1.06
  5. 10.1080/1360786021000006983
  6. 10.2307/1131149
  7. 10.1080/10862969209547779
  8. 10.3928/00989134-20100602-01
  9. 10.1080/15348431.2017.1319369
  10. 10.1080/10665684.2012.698182
  11. 10.1080/14623943.2017.1294531
  12. 10.1007/978-1-4419-5728-3_4
  13. 10.1080/03601270903534804
  14. 10.1111/jgs.13236
  15. 10.1007/s10643-010-0438-5
  16. 10.1300/J016v27n01_01
  17. 10.1093/fampra/11.3.260
  18. 10.1007/BF03339750
  19. 10.1177/0192513X19868830
  20. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  21. 10.1177/14680173211010399
  22. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.823
  23. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00289.x
  24. 10.1007/s10433-018-00497-4
  25. 10.1093/geront/39.2.235
  26. 10.3233/EFI-180221
  27. 10.1177/0146167201277003
  28. 10.1080/15350770.2016.1160740
  29. 10.1016/S0193-3973(01)00080-6
  30. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01358.x
  31. 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101400
  32. 10.1177/089124395009005005
  33. 10.2466/pms.99.1.208-210
  34. 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.11.008
  35. 10.1186/1471-2288-7-4
  36. 10.1300/J194v03n03_07
  37. 10.1177/0022022197286006
  38. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112
  39. 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.10.1122
  40. 10.1186/s12889-019-6480-3
  41. 10.2307/30046888
  42. 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893
  43. 10.2117/psysoc.2013.45
  44. 10.1136/bmj.n71
  45. 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90105-4
  46. Pennebaker J. W., Seagal J. D. (1999). Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical…
  47. 10.5817/CP2015-2-5
  48. 10.1002/trtr.1364
  49. 10.1080/713844306
  50. 10.1080/15401383.2020.1760988
  51. 10.1007/s10935-006-0051-y
  52. 10.1080/0380127830090512
  53. 10.1186/s13643-018-0680-2
  54. 10.1080/03634520009379200
  55. 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472
  56. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114963
  57. 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
  58. 10.1080/17439760500510676
  59. 10.1080/09515070.2018.1542519
  60. 10.1177/1049732309354095
  61. 10.1007/978-3-030-33069-9_7
  62. 10.1177/1749975515573267
  63. 10.1007/s10902-011-9257-7
  64. 10.1080/02615479.2012.704011
  65. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
  66. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →