Lexical Patterns in Adolescents’ Online Writing: The Impact of Age, Gender, and Education

Lisa Hilte University of Antwerp ; Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp ; Reinhild Vandekerckhove University of Antwerp

Abstract

This article examines the impact of the sociodemographic profile (including age, gender, and educational track) of Flemish adolescents (aged 13–20) on lexical aspects of their informal online discourse. The focus on lexical and more “traditional,” print-based aspects of literacy is meant to complement previous research on sociolinguistic variation with respect to the use of prototypical features of social media writing. Drawing on a corpus of 434,537 social media posts written by 1,384 teenagers, a variety of lexical features and related parameters is examined, including lexical richness, top favorite words, and word length. The analyses reveal a strong common ground among the adolescents with respect to some features but divergent writing practices by different groups of teenagers with regard to other parameters. Furthermore, this study analyzes both standardized versions of social media messages and the original utterances (including nonstandard markers of online writing). Strikingly, different results emerge with respect to adolescents’ exploitation of more traditional versus digital literacy skills in relation to their sociodemographic profile, especially with respect to sentiment expression (verbal versus typographic/pictorial). The study suggests that the inclusion of nonverbal communicative strategies, for instance in language teaching, might be a pedagogical asset, since these strategies are eagerly adopted by teenagers who show proof of less developed traditional writing skills.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2020-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088320917921
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 26 works outside this index ↓
  1. Argamon S., Koppel M., Pennebaker J. W., Schler J. (2009). Automatically profiling the author of an anonymous…
  2. Bamman D., Eisenstein J., Schnoebelen T. (2014). Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journ…
  3. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.003.0004
  4. De Decker B., Vandekerckhove R. (2017). Global features of online communication in local Flemish: Social and …
  5. Drouin M., Driver B. (2014). Texting, textese and literacy abilities: A naturalistic study. Journal of Resear…
  6. Finlay S. C. (2014). Age and gender in Reddit commenting and success. Journal of Information Science Theory a…
  7. Han B., Cook P., Baldwin T. (2013). Lexical normalization for social media text. ACM Transactions on Intellig…
  8. Hilte L., Vandekerckhove R., Daelemans W. (2018a). Adolescents’ social background and non-standard writing in…
  9. Hilte L., Vandekerckhove R., Daelemans W. (2018b). Expressive markers in online teenage talk: A correlational…
  10. Hilte L., Vandekerckhove R., Daelemans W. (2019). Adolescents’ perceptions of social media writing: Has non-s…
  11. Lillis T., McMullan J., Tuck J. (2018). Gender and academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes…
  12. Malvern D., Richards B. (2012). Measures of lexical richness. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. htt…
  13. Mehl M. R., Pennebaker J. W. (2003). The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students’ daily so…
  14. Newman M. L., Groom C. J., Handelman L. D., Pennebaker J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An a…
  15. Nguyen D. A., Doğruöz S., Rosé C. P., de Jong F. (2016). Computational sociolinguistics: A survey. Computatio…
  16. Peterson S. S., Parr J. M. (2012). Gender and literacy issues and research: Placing the spotlight on writing.…
  17. 10.1017/CBO9780511732942
  18. Sankoff D., Lessard R. (1975). Vocabulary richness: A sociolinguistic analysis. Science, 190(4215), 689–690. …
  19. Schwartz H. A., Eichstaedt J. C., Kern M. L., Dziurzynski L., Ramones S. M., Agrawal M., Shah A., Kosinski M.…
  20. Singh S. (2001). A pilot study on gender differences in conversational speech on lexical richness measures. L…
  21. Tagliamonte S. (2016). So sick or so cool? The language of the youth on the internet. Language in Society, 45…
  22. Vandekerckhove R., Sandra D. (2016). De potentiële impact van informele online communicatie op de spellingpra…
  23. Van Hout R., Vermeer A. (2007). Comparing measures of lexical richness. In Daller H., Milton J., Treffers-Dal…
  24. Varnhagen C. K., McFall G. P., Pugh N., Routledge L., Sumida-MacDonald H., Kwong T. E. (2010). Lol: New langu…
  25. Vermeer A. (2000). Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing, 17(1),…
  26. Yu G. (2009). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236–25…
CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network →