Endangered Literacies? Affordances of Paper-Based Literacy in Medical Practice and Its Persistence in the Transition to Digital Technology

Laura Sterponi University of California, Berkeley ; Cristina Zucchermaglio Sapienza University of Rome ; Francesca Alby Sapienza University of Rome ; Marilena Fatigante Sapienza University of Rome

Abstract

Under the rapid advances of digital technology, traditional paper-based forms of reading and writing are steadily giving way to digital-based literacies, in theory as well as in application. Drawing on a study of literacy in a medical workplace context, this article examines critically the shift toward computer-mediated textual practices. While a considerable body of research has investigated benefits and issues associated with digital literacy tools in medicine, we consider the affordances of paper-based practices. Our analysis of verbal interaction and textual artifacts drawn from a qualitative study of oncology visits indicates that the uses of pen and paper are advantageous for both doctor and patient. Specifically, they allow doctors to process and package information in ways that are favorable to their personal modus operandi, and they enable patients to participate in the medical visit and take an active role in managing their medical treatment. Understanding the affordances of paper-based literacy provides insights for refining digital tools as well as for motivating the design of possible hybrid forms and digital-analog intersections that can best support medical practices.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2017-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088317723304
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication

References (52) · 7 in this index

  1. 10.1515/9783110214222.215
  2. Written Communication
  3. 10.1197/jamia.M1097
  4. 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10939100
  5. 10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00200-3
Show all 52 →
  1. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1997.tb00490.x
  2. Written Communication
  3. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.10.002
  4. Written Communication
  5. 10.2307/465279
  6. 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80
  7. The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts
  8. Vegetal and mineral memory: The future of books
  9. 10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.007
  10. Paper presented at the Revisiting Participation: Language, Body and Interaction conference
  11. 10.21832/9781800418097
  12. Langage & Travail
  13. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.024
  14. 10.1093/fampra/12.1.32
  15. 10.1016/0953-5438(93)90018-O
  16. Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy
  17. Computers and Composition
  18. 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11345612
  19. 10.1145/240080.240342
  20. 10.1177/019027250506800103
  21. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief
  22. Knowledge and Society
  23. Science in Action
  24. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  25. 10.1145/143457.143475
  26. Video analysis: Methodology and methods
  27. 10.1177/0272989X10385846
  28. 10.1075/ps.5.2.03nie
  29. ICT in Sanità: Mettere in circolo l’innovazione
  30. 10.37514/PER-B.2003.2317.2.06
  31. 10.1037/a0036834
  32. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00782.x
  33. 10.1016/S1386-5056(00)00106-4
  34. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
  35. 10.1515/semi.1998.118.3-4.281
  36. 10.4159/harvard.9780674433014
  37. Health and the rhetoric of medicine
  38. Written Communication
  39. 10.1007/s11606-007-0393-z
  40. 10.1177/030631289019003001
  41. Literacy in theory and practice
  42. 10.1558/cam.v8i1.3
  43. Written Communication
  44. 10.1145/2379057.2379101
  45. Technical Communication Quarterly
  46. The creative destruction of medicine
  47. Presentation at the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme Safeguarding of Enda…