Abstract

This article introduces the concept of stylization and illustrates its usefulness for studying online discourse by examining how writers have employed it in order to parody sexist products such as BIC Cristal for Her, using genderlect in order to introduce dissonance into and reframe patriarchal discourse. A corpus analysis of 671 reviews, written from August through October 2012, confirmed a dramatically higher presence of lexical items and adjectives often stereotyped as feminine, compared to a reference corpus of other parody reviews, as well as the GloWbe corpus housed at Brigham Young University. A qualitative analysis shows the stylized use of these features, and how they contribute to the construction of personas that are intended to mock the sexism inherent in BIC’s advertising. This analysis hopes to encourage more attention to how stylization functions in emerging online genres.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2016-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088315621238
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (73) · 8 in this index

  1. On multimodality: New media in composition studies
  2. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
  3. 10.1111/josl.12080
  4. The language and sexuality reader
  5. Bartels L. (2014, September 23). Jefferson county school board ridiculed on Twitter. Denver Post. Retrieved f…
Show all 73 →
  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
  2. Writing studies research
  3. 10.1017/S0047404599002043
  4. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0007
  5. Rhetoric Review
  6. The myth of Mars and Venus
  7. 10.1353/clj.2012.0042
  8. 10.1177/0146167299025004002
  9. Cherise Z. (2014, April 28). Sight . at long last. Review posted to http://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews…
  10. 10.1075/prag.14.2-3.10chu
  11. Women, men, and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language
  12. 10.1017/S0047404501003013
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511755064
  14. Davies M. (2012, August 27). Amazon customers go rogue, hilariously review Bic’s idiotic pen for women. Jezeb…
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991
  16. The Ellen DeGeneres Show
  17. 10.1177/0146167200262001
  18. Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries
  19. 10.1017/CBO9781139245883
  20. A heartbreaking work of staggering genius
  21. 10.1111/j.1548-1395.2008.00006.x
  22. Unspoken: A rhetoric of silence
  23. Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self
  24. 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.125
  25. Women and literacy: Local and global inquiries for a new century
  26. College Composition and Communication
  27. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00287.x
  28. 10.2307/j.ctt46nws6.14
  29. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  30. 10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00316.x
  31. 10.2307/2111526
  32. Judkis M. (2012, August 29). Bic “lady” pens unleash Amazon snarkfest. Washington Post. Retrieved from http:/…
  33. Kantrowitz R. H. (2014, March 6). From a man’s perspective. Review posted to http://www.amazon.com/gp/custome…
  34. Kelly K. A. (2012, August 29). Pretty, pretty pen. Review posted to http://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews…
  35. kt42. (2012, August 28). Warning—packaging flaw. Review posted to http://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R…
  36. Language and woman’s place
  37. 10.1177/106591290405700312
  38. College Composition and Communication
  39. Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice
  40. McLemore C. (1991). The pragmatic interpretation of English intonation: Sorority speech (Unpublished doctoral…
  41. The language and sexuality reader
  42. Nudd T. (2012, August 27). “Bic for Her” pens deluged with sarcastic reviews on Amazon. AdWeek. Retrieved fro…
  43. Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon
  44. Written Communication
  45. Women and literacy: Local and global inquiries for a new century
  46. Prager J. (2014, September 24). Twitter users mercilessly bash right-wing attempt to rewrite history for high…
  47. 10.1145/1871985.1871993
  48. 10.3115/1117729.1117730
  49. Read M. (2012, August 28). Hilarious Amazon reviewers take on Bic’s stupid, sexist “For Her” women’s pens. Ga…
  50. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  51. College Composition and Communication
  52. Ridolfo J., DeVoss D. N. (2009, January 15). Composing for recomposition: Rhetorical velocity and delivery. K…
  53. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb00986.x
  54. Feminist rhetorical practices: New horizons for rhetoric, composition, and literacy studies
  55. 10.1002/9781118258002
  56. Journal of Writing Research
  57. Political Psychology
  58. Schnitzie. (2012, August 28). Very pretty but awfully small for champagne containers. Review posted to http:/…
  59. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00427.x
  60. Shah A. (2012, September 10). Far too expensive for some ladies. Review posted to http://www.amazon.com/gp/cu…
  61. The available means of persuasion: mapping a theory and pedagogy of multimodal public rhetoric
  62. Sieckowski C. (202, August 31). Bic Pens “For Her” get hilariously snarky Amazon reviews. Huffington Post. Re…
  63. Developing linguistic corpora: A guide to good practice
  64. 10.2307/j.ctt20q1z08
  65. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1673
  66. Gender and discourse
  67. The discourse of online consumer reviews
  68. Zafar A. (2012, August 31). Bic creates pens “For Her”: Amazon reviewers turn on the snark. Time. Retrieved f…