The Relationship between Gender and Topic in Gender-Preferential Language Use

Written Communication Oct 2004

The Relationship between Gender and Topic in Gender-Preferential Language Use

Anna Janssen University of Otago ; Tamar Murachver University of Otago

Abstract

This study investigates the roles of biological and psychological gender, as well as assigned discussion topic, in the written language use of nonprofessional writers. University students wrote passages on three specific topics—one socioemotional and descriptive, one functional, and one involving political debate. Effects of biological gender were minimal. Psychological gender played a greater role, particularly when measured explicitly rather than implicitly. Passage topic played the greatest role in language use. Rather than enacting their own gender through their writing, writers used language befitting the passage topic. More female-preferential devices featured in passages involving socioemotional descriptions and more male-preferential features were employed in passages involving political debate. The study demonstrates the relative impacts of gender and contextual constraints on communication.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2004-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088304270028
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Herring et al. (2009)

Symbolic Capital in a Virtual Heterosexual Market

Written Communication

Cites in this index (1)

Rubin et al. (1992)

Gender-Typical Style in Written Language

Research in the Teaching of English

Also cites 46 works outside this index ↓

10.1023/A:1018802521676

↗
10.1515/text.2003.014

↗
10.2466/pr0.1982.51.1.127

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.181

↗
10.1037/h0036215

↗
10.2307/3053984

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941

↗
10.1111/0022-4537.00238

↗
10.1023/A:1018822800063

↗
10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

↗
10.1177/026192702237955

↗
10.1017/S0047404500005030

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800

↗
10.2307/2786768

↗
10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333

↗
10.1177/009365086013004006

↗
10.1177/0261927X95141002

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197

↗
Hall, J. A. (1984)

Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style

↗
10.1016/0378-2166(88)90005-7

↗
10.1177/0957926592003002001

↗
10.1080/08934219809367681

↗
10.1177/0261927X04263822

↗
10.1007/BF02936348

↗
10.1093/llc/17.4.401

↗
10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.3

↗
10.1177/016502549601900401

↗
10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17377.x

↗
10.1093/hcr/27.1.121

↗
10.1177/0261927X8652001

↗
10.1016/0271-5309(94)90007-8

↗
10.1080/03637758609376131

↗
10.1177/0261927X00019004001

↗
10.1007/BF00289762

↗
10.1080/03637758809376175

↗
10.2307/358197

↗
Peterson, S. (2001)

10.58680/la2001184

Language Arts ↗
10.1177/0261927X03255304

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.856

↗
10.1007/BF00288888

↗
10.1348/014466601164812

↗
10.1111/1467-9280.00329

↗
10.1007/BF01543119

↗
10.1177/0891243287001002002

↗
10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00122.x

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 17 View in citation network →