The Relationship between Gender and Topic in Gender-Preferential Language Use

Anna Janssen University of Otago ; Tamar Murachver University of Otago

Abstract

This study investigates the roles of biological and psychological gender, as well as assigned discussion topic, in the written language use of nonprofessional writers. University students wrote passages on three specific topics—one socioemotional and descriptive, one functional, and one involving political debate. Effects of biological gender were minimal. Psychological gender played a greater role, particularly when measured explicitly rather than implicitly. Passage topic played the greatest role in language use. Rather than enacting their own gender through their writing, writers used language befitting the passage topic. More female-preferential devices featured in passages involving socioemotional descriptions and more male-preferential features were employed in passages involving political debate. The study demonstrates the relative impacts of gender and contextual constraints on communication.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2004-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088304270028
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

References (62) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.1023/A:1018802521676
  2. 10.1515/text.2003.014
  3. 10.2466/pr0.1982.51.1.127
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.181
  5. The psychology of gender
Show all 62 →
  1. 10.1037/h0036215
  2. 10.2307/3053984
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941
  4. 10.1111/0022-4537.00238
  5. 10.1023/A:1018822800063
  6. Women, men, and language: A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language
  7. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  8. 10.1177/026192702237955
  9. 10.1017/S0047404500005030
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800
  11. 10.2307/2786768
  12. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
  13. 10.1177/009365086013004006
  14. 10.1177/0261927X95141002
  15. Speech style and evaluation
  16. Language and gender
  17. Men are from Mars, women are from Venus
  18. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
  19. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
  20. Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style
  21. Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self
  22. The way women write
  23. 10.1016/0378-2166(88)90005-7
  24. 10.1177/0957926592003002001
  25. Women, men and politeness
  26. 10.1080/08934219809367681
  27. 10.1177/0261927X04263822
  28. Language, its nature, development and origin
  29. 10.1007/BF02936348
  30. 10.1093/llc/17.4.401
  31. Talking power: The politics of language
  32. 10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.3
  33. 10.1177/016502549601900401
  34. 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17377.x
  35. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
  36. 10.1093/hcr/27.1.121
  37. 10.1177/0261927X8652001
  38. 10.1016/0271-5309(94)90007-8
  39. 10.1080/03637758609376131
  40. 10.1177/0261927X00019004001
  41. 10.1007/BF00289762
  42. 10.1080/03637758809376175
  43. 10.2307/358197
  44. 10.58680/la2001184
    Language Arts  
  45. 10.1177/0261927X03255304
  46. Research in the Teaching of English
  47. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.856
  48. The new handbook of language and social psychology
  49. 10.1007/BF00288888
  50. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation
  51. 10.1348/014466601164812
  52. 10.1111/1467-9280.00329
  53. Pacific Attitudes Toward Gender Scale
  54. 10.1007/BF01543119
  55. 10.1177/0891243287001002002
  56. 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00122.x
  57. Language and sex: Differences and dominance