Are Our Courses Working?

N. ANN CHENOWETH ; JOHN R. HAYES ; PAUL GRIPP Carnegie Mellon University ; ELIZA BETH LITTLETON ; ERWIN R. STEINBERG ; DAVID A. VAN EVERY Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

This article describes an assessment carried out in collaboration with the administrators of a large freshman English course. The assessment team worked with instructors to identify course goals and to design tasks that the instructors felt would fairly assess the extent to which the students achieved the goals. Students who did and did not take the course were both pre- and posttested on five central goals: critical reading, argument identification, differentiation of summary and paraphrase, understanding of key terms used in the course, and practical strategies for writing academic papers. Results of the assessment failed to indicate any substantial improvement on any of the five course goals for students who took the course. These results contrasted with positive outcomes obtained by the same assessment team with introductory history and statistics courses. The article concludes with reflections on why instructors may fail to recognize that their courses are not working.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1999-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088399016001002
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 1 work outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/S0022-3182(88)80228-0
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →