Written Communication Jul 1996

Do Adults Change their Minds after Reading Persuasive Text?

MARILYN J. CHAMBLISS ; RUTH GARNER

Abstract

To change the mind of a reader, authors compose written persuasion according to a set of rhetorical features. This article describes the features of persuasive texts and reviews research results to explore whether adults indeed change their minds after reading persuasion. Toulmin's (1958) model of argument and Aristotle's model of persuasive content characterize the structure and content of well-written persuasion. Research in social psychology and text comprehension shows that adults typically build a case for their own prereading belief rather than process a persuasive text mindfully, weigh evidence, and change their beliefs. An important contract between author and reader is typically broken. Research on designing text to disabuse students of scientific misconceptions points to text features that authors could use to encourage readers to read persuasion mindfully.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1996-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088396013003001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (46) · 4 in this index

  1. Alexander, P.
    An introduction to logic: The criticism of arguments
     ↗
  2. 10.1037/h0077720
     ↗
  3. Astington, J. W.
    Developing theories of mind
  4. Beck, I. L.
    Building the quality of thinking in and out of our schools in the twenty-first century
  5. 10.3102/0013189X020003010
     ↗
Show all 46 →
  1. Brooks, C.
    Modern rhetoric
  2. 10.1080/00461520.1990.9653116
     ↗
  3. 10.1080/00461520.1987.9653057
     ↗
  4. Chambliss, M. J.
    Beliefs about text and instruction with text
  5. 10.2307/748198
     ↗
  6. Cooper, L.
    The rhetoric of Aristotle
     ↗
  7. Corbett, E.P.J.
    Classical rhetoric of the modern student
  8. CRISMORE et al. (1993)
    Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and F…
    Written Communication
  9. Dole, J. A.
    Beliefs about text and instruction with text
  10. DURST et al. (1990)
    Appealing Texts: The Persuasive Writing of High School Students
    Written Communication
  11. Fiske, S.T.
    Social cognition
  12. Flavell, J. H.
    Developing theories of mind
  13. Garner, R.
    Metacognition and reading comprehension
  14. 10.3102/00346543060004517
     ↗
  15. Garner, R.
    annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  16. 10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2
     ↗
  17. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107
     ↗
  18. Hairston, M. C.
    Successful writing
  19. 10.2307/355033
     ↗
  20. KINNEAVY et al. (1994)
    Kairos in Aristotle's Rhetoric
    Written Communication
  21. 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.674
     ↗
  22. 10.1080/00221309.1946.10544530
     ↗
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
     ↗
  24. Nickerson, R. S.
    Informal reasoning and education
  25. Nisbett, R. E.
    Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
  26. 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90030-0
     ↗
  27. Ramage, J. D.
    Writing arguments: A rhetoric with readings
  28. Ross, L.
    Social cognitive development
  29. Ross, L.
    A distinctive approach to psychological research: The influence of Stanley Schachter
  30. Rumelhart, D.E.
    Theoretical issues in reading comprehension
  31. 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90048-D
     ↗
  32. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
     ↗
  33. SPIVEY (1990)
    Transforming Texts: Constructive Processes in Reading and Writing
    Written Communication
  34. Stein, N. L.
    Informal reasoning and education
  35. Toulmin, S. E.
    The uses of argument
     ↗
  36. Tversky, A.
    Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
  37. Ullmann, O.
    San Jose Mercury News
  38. 10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
     ↗
  39. van Dijk, T. A.
    Strategies of discourse comprehension
  40. Warnick, B.
    Critical thinking and communication
  41. Williams, J. M.
    Informal reasoning and education
CrossRef global citation count: 46 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  2. Poroi Feb 2026
    Using Stasis Theory as a Heuristic for Examining Epistemological Dilemmas in a Post-Truth Landscape ↗
    Bruce Bowles
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  3. Res Rhetorica Jan 2026
    Ethos – between vir bonus and VIA: Virtue ethics in contemporary rhetorical education ↗
    Agnieszka Budzyńska-Daca
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory argument
  4. Rhetorica Jan 2026
    The Daimonion of Isocrates: Anti-Socratic Polemics and the Power of Politikoi Logoi in the Philippos ↗
    Tobias Hirsch
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2025
    The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958 ↗
    Christopher W. Tindale
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis revision argument collaborative writing editorial matter