Abstract

This article explores some of the confusion and sources of that confusion in the research relating parts of clauses to the communicative roles that they play. It proposes that M.A.K. Halliday's system of analyzing a sentence into one or more of three possible kinds of themes and a rheme is a useful system in which the research relating parts of clauses to their communicative roles can be carried out. The article examines and briefly critiques Halliday's system of analysis and then goes on to compare some of Halliday's terms with those used in other systems. The article concludes by discussing some implications that this system might have for understanding aspects of discourse production, structure, or reception.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1991-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088391008003002
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00437956.1986.11435767
  2. 10.1515/text.1.1981.1.1.97
  3. 10.1515/text.1.1983.3.2.155
  4. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01340.x
  5. 10.1017/S0022226700016613
  6. 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4
  7. 10.2307/1127600
  8. 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90023-0
  9. The philosophy of grammar
  10. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1968.tb01110.x
  11. 10.1515/text.1.1985.5.4.327
  12. 10.3765/bls.v3i0.2252
  13. 10.1007/BF01066930
  14. 10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80197-5
  15. 10.1515/text.1.1983.3.2.197
  16. 10.2307/356693
  17. 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90294-9
CrossRef global citation count: 18 View in citation network →