Abstract

This article presents evidence that, from selected spectroscopic articles in the earliest volumes of the Physical Review to other selected spectroscopic articles from the same journal in 1980, a shift in sentence style takes place. This shift is from what M.A.K. Halliday calls the dynamic style (which reflects happenings, processes, and actions) to the synoptic style (which reflects things, structures, and categories). The article proposes that the early writers used the dynamic style primarily to set information in a distinct time and thus to avoid giving the impression that the information should be regarded as widely generalizable. It also proposes that the later writers used the synoptic style because it allowed them to represent processes as things, to delineate many fine shades of meaning, and to extend their arguments economically. The article concludes by suggesting areas of future research for students of scientific style and for composition scholars.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2002-04-01
DOI
10.1177/074108830201900201
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

References (48) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1177/030631284014002001
  2. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.1216
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.032714
  5. Scientific English, a guide for scientists and other professionals
Show all 48 →
  1. Howto write and publish a scientific paper
  2. 10.1086/353797
  3. The Scribner handbook for writers
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.200
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.241
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.148
  9. The linguistics of writing: Arguments between language and literature
  10. Comprehending oral and written language
  11. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power
  12. An introduction to functional grammar
  13. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science
  14. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power
  15. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition
  16. Constructing rhetorical education
  17. 10.2190/SGC
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.1225
  19. Revising prose
  20. 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
  21. The new St. Martin's handbook
  22. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science
  23. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science
  24. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science
  25. An elementary treatise on electricity
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.032712
  27. Physical Review
  28. Physical Review
  29. Opticks, or a treatise of the reflections refractions inflections and colours of light
  30. Physical Review
  31. Physical Review
  32. The history and present state of electricity
  33. Acomprehensive grammar of the English language
  34. Physical Review
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.132
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.248
  37. Conjuring science: Scientific symbols and cultural meanings in American life
  38. Simon and Schuster handbook for writers
  39. Written Communication
  40. Written Communication
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevA.22.188
  42. Style in language
  43. Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace