Creating Rhetorical Stability in Corporate University Discourse

Brenton Faber Clarkson University

Abstract

Written communication scholarship has shown that successful social change requires discursive stability. This study was designed to investigate how this stability is created. Critical discourse analysis of 30 corporate university articles investigated claims authors made about the expansion of market-based values into contexts of organizational learning and academic higher education. In total, 243 claims were examined for uses of modality, hedging, presupposition, and the progressive aspect. Results claim that articles used modality, hedging, and the progressive aspect to create strategic ambiguity that was resolved ideologically through presuppositions that reflect the assumptions of “the new capitalism.” Results indicate that discursive stability is not solely a semantic issue but may occur pragmatically and syntactically as texts are structured to displace existing knowledge within contested spaces. Results also indicate that a heavy reliance on pragmatic features may characterize technologized texts, texts designed to create social change without input, democratic participation, or consensus building.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2003-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088303259869
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Written Communication
Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/0021886300362002
  2. Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison’s light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Brown, G.& Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  4. 10.1177/0957926598009004003
  5. Grabill, J. (2001). Community literacy programs and the politics of change. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  6. Hawthorne, E. M., Libby, P. A. & Nash, N. S. (1983). The emergence of corporate colleges. Journal of Continui…
  7. 10.1177/0957926598009003003
  8. 10.1093/applin/10.1.1
  9. 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00062-4
  10. 10.2307/358914
  11. Thompson, G. (2000). Unfulfilled prophecy: The evolution of corporate colleges. Journal of Higher Education, …
  12. Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R.& Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.
  13. 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00034-3
  14. 10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00068-X
  15. 10.1177/0957926595006002006
  16. Wood, L. & Kroger, R. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousan…
CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network →