The Uses and Complexity of Argument Structures in Expert and Student Persuasive Writing

Written Communication Apr 1998

The Uses and Complexity of Argument Structures in Expert and Student Persuasive Writing

JOANNA G. CRAMMOND McGill University

Abstract

This study investigated differences among student writers at three grade levels (6, 8, and 10) and between expert writers and students in terms of the uses and complexity of arguments presented in their persuasive texts. To analyze argument, a model was developed that could account for structural variations occurring across a range of writing situations. The characteristics of this model were defined using categories derived from a model of semantic representation in discourse. The structural analysis revealed that (a) argument was the predominant organizational structure for all writers, (b) more than 80% of students produced arguments involving some form of opposition, (c) embedded arguments identified in expert texts functioned primarily as countered rebuttals and in student texts as subclaims or reservations, and (d) expert texts contained relatively higher frequencies of warrants, countered rebuttals, and modals, and student uses of these substructures increased with grade.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 1998-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088398015002004
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multimodality

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

Felton et al. (2015)

Arguing to Agree

Written Communication
Faber (2003)

Creating Rhetorical Stability in Corporate University Discourse

Written Communication
Le (2003)

Information Sourcesas a Persuasive Strategy in Editorials

Written Communication
Bracewell et al. (2003)

Tasks, Ensembles, and Activity

Written Communication
Lunsford (2002)

Contextualizing Toulmin's Model in the Writing Classroom

Written Communication

Show all 8 →

STAPLETON (2001)

Assessing Critical Thinking in the Writing of Japanese University Students

Written Communication
HAYES et al. (1999)

Issues in Measuring Reliability

Written Communication
BRACEWELL (1999)

Objects of Study in Situated Literacy

Written Communication

Cites in this index (11)

Ferris (1994)

Rhetorical Strategies in Student Persuasive Writing: Differences between Native…

Research in the Teaching of English
Crowhurst (1991)

Interrelationships Between Reading and Writing Persuasive Discourse

Research in the Teaching of English
DURST et al. (1990)

Appealing Texts

Written Communication
Connor (1990)

Linguistic/Rhetorical Measures for International Persuasive Student Writing

Research in the Teaching of English
McCann (1989)

Student Argumentative Writing Knowledge and Ability at Three Grade Levels

Research in the Teaching of English

Show all 11 →

Crowhurst (1987)

Cohesion in Argument and Narration at Three Grade Levels

Research in the Teaching of English
McCulley (1985)

Writing Quality, Coherence, and Cohesion

Research in the Teaching of English
FLOWER et al. (1984)

Images, Plans, and Prose

Written Communication
Crowhurst (1980)

Syntactic Complexity and Teachers’ Quality Ratings of Narrations and Arguments

Research in the Teaching of English
Rubin et al. (1979)

Development in Syntactic and Strategic Aspects of Audience Adaptation Skills in…

Research in the Teaching of English
Crowhurst et al. (1979)

Audience and Mode of Discourse Effects on Syntactic Complexity in Writing at Tw…

Research in the Teaching of English

Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓

10.2307/1128437

↗
10.2307/358112

↗
10.1016/0010-0285(75)90016-X

↗
10.1080/01638539409544891

↗
10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363

↗
10.1080/00220973.1991.10806557

↗
10.1080/00220671.1992.9944434

↗
10.1016/0749-596X(86)90036-7

↗
10.1080/01638538709544676

↗
10.1145/366193.366201

↗
10.1080/03637757909376009

↗
10.2307/1130025

↗
10.1207/s1532690xci0201_1

↗
10.1007/BF00710664

↗
Toulmin, S. E.

The uses of argument

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 91 View in citation network →