Abstract

L2 writing scholars have recently debated the appropriateness of using cultural constructs to enhance the teaching of English. An important aspect of writing, critical thinking, has received considerable attention. Some have suggested that Asians, including Japanese, do not display critical thought in their writing in English. Other researchers claim that Asians display critical thinking abilities differently than Western learners. In addition, they argue that learners from a particular culture are too diverse to make claims about the whole group's thinking abilities. This study proposes a model for assessing critical thinking in the writing of L2 learners to determine whether content familiarity plays a role in critical thinking. Findings of a study of 45 Japanese undergraduate students indicate that the quality of critical thought depended on the topic content, with a familiar topic generating better critical thinking. Results also suggested that differing assumptions between the L1 and L2 culture may lead to misinterpretations of the critical thinking ability of L2 learners.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2001-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088301018004004
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. College Composition and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/3587975
  2. 10.2307/3586498
  3. 10.2307/3588005
  4. 10.2307/3587906
  5. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80120-9
  6. 10.5840/teachphil19982113
  7. 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.93
  8. 10.5840/inquiryctnews199515222
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
  10. 10.2307/3588189
  11. Thinking in education
  12. 10.1037/h0054346
  13. 10.17763/haer.66.3.n47r06u264944865
  14. 10.2307/3588003
  15. 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90007-2
  16. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X
  17. 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90013-2
  18. 10.5070/L472005242
    Issues in Applied Linguistics  
  19. Rationality redeemed
  20. 10.2307/3587886
  21. 10.2307/3587759
  22. The uses of argument
  23. 10.2307/3588050
CrossRef global citation count: 78 View in citation network →