Abstract

L2 writing scholars have recently debated the appropriateness of using cultural constructs to enhance the teaching of English. An important aspect of writing, critical thinking, has received considerable attention. Some have suggested that Asians, including Japanese, do not display critical thought in their writing in English. Other researchers claim that Asians display critical thinking abilities differently than Western learners. In addition, they argue that learners from a particular culture are too diverse to make claims about the whole group's thinking abilities. This study proposes a model for assessing critical thinking in the writing of L2 learners to determine whether content familiarity plays a role in critical thinking. Findings of a study of 45 Japanese undergraduate students indicate that the quality of critical thought depended on the topic content, with a familiar topic generating better critical thinking. Results also suggested that differing assumptions between the L1 and L2 culture may lead to misinterpretations of the critical thinking ability of L2 learners.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2001-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088301018004004
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Assessing Writing
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Assessing Writing
  4. Argumentation

References (63) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.2307/3587975
  2. Asking the right questions
  3. 10.2307/3586498
  4. 10.2307/3588005
  5. Language socialization across cultures
Show all 63 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. 10.2307/3587906
  3. JALT Journal
  4. How we think
  5. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80120-9
  6. 10.5840/teachphil19982113
  7. The Ennis-Weir critical thinking essay test
  8. Ending California's water crisis: A market solution to the politics of water
  9. Listening to the world: Cultural issues in academic writing
  10. Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Research and open questions
  11. Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice
  12. 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.93
  13. 10.5840/inquiryctnews199515222
  14. Handbook of reading research
  15. Understanding Japanese society
  16. Japan almanac 2000
  17. Japan: Who governs? The rise of the developmental state
  18. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
  19. Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform
  20. Guardian Weekly
  21. 10.2307/3588189
  22. The wealth and poverty of nations
  23. Academic writing: Exploring processes and strategies
  24. “Good writing” in cross-cultural context
  25. Thinking in education
  26. The Economist
  27. 10.1037/h0054346
  28. 10.17763/haer.66.3.n47r06u264944865
  29. Teaching critical thinking
  30. 10.2307/3588003
  31. Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction
  32. Evaluating critical thinking
  33. 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90007-2
  34. Writing arguments
  35. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X
  36. 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90013-2
  37. 10.5070/L472005242
    Issues in Applied Linguistics  
  38. The Japanese today
  39. Education and learning to think
  40. Understanding understanding
  41. Orientalism
  42. Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication
  43. College Composition and Communication
  44. Teaching critical thinking
  45. Rationality redeemed
  46. Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Research and open questions
  47. Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals' abuse of science
  48. 10.2307/3587886
  49. Written Communication
  50. 10.2307/3587759
  51. ELT Journal
  52. annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication
  53. An introduction to Japanese society
  54. The uses of argument
  55. The enigma of Japanese power
  56. Consilience
  57. Honyakugo seiritsu jijou [How foreign words came to be translated]
  58. 10.2307/3588050