Abstract

In sentences with validity markers in the syntactic subject and adjacent positions, the frequent correspondence between syntactic subject and sentence topic in English sentences is broken. Because this correspondence has been shown to have substantial and positive effects upon readers' processing of and perceptions about texts, breaking the correspondence might have significant negative effects on readers. This study begins to explore how such syntactic subjects affect readers. It shows that readers recall such subjects very poorly, but it also suggests that in order to discover more precisely how readers represent such subjects in memory, new and rich models of language and of possible domains in texts will be needed.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1985-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088385002004001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Assessing Writing
  2. Written Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review

References (21) · 1 in this index

  1. Papers on functional sentence perspective
  2. Constructing texts, elements of a theory of composition and style
  3. New essays in technical and scientific communication
  4. Papers on functional sentence perspective
  5. Tough, sweet, and stuffy: An essay on modern American prose styles
Show all 21 →
  1. 10.1016/0001-6918(56)90009-9
  2. Explorations in the functions of language
  3. Papers on functional sentence perspective
  4. Language as social semiotic, the social interpretation of language and meaning
  5. Cohesion in English
  6. Essays on the language of literature
  7. Text-linguistics, cognitive learning and language teaching
  8. 10.2307/376843
  9. Cognition and reality
  10. 10.2307/461344
  11. 10.1007/BF01067496
  12. Some aspects of text grammars
  13. Texas Law Review
  14. Style: Ten lessons in clarity & grace
  15. Style and variables in English
  16. College Composition and Communication