Abstract

ABSTRACTThis essay examines the lives of two pianists with significant impairments of their right arms: Paul Wittgenstein, a classical pianist who lost his right arm in World War I, and Horace Parlan, a jazz pianist who lost full use of his right hand due to childhood polio. Drawing on theories of mêtis and passing developed by queer theory and disability studies scholars, we theorize aural passing to examine how Parlan and Wittgenstein differently navigated the rhetorical constraints of their respective musical genres. Engaging a rhetorical biography of each performer’s unique mêtis, we compare how disabled forms of passing are not equivalent across all instances and conclude by meditating on the entrenched ableism of musical pedagogy and performance.KEYWORDS: Aural passingclassical musicdisabilityjazzmêtis AcknowledgmentsWe thank Michael Lechuga, Emma McDonnell, Mark Pedelty, Kate Rich, and Aubrey Weber who all provided feedback on earlier drafts of this essay.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Normate is a term developed by Rosemarie Garland-Thompson to mean “the constructed identity of those who, by way of the bodily configurations and cultural capital they assume, can step into a position of authority and wield the power it grants them” (8). Throughout this essay, we draw on this term to reference the link between the social construction of normative ablism and embodied standards of self-expression (Dolmage, “Back Matter” 351–52).2 Deleuze and Guattari admit that “becoming-imperceptible means many things” and, in a close parallel to the animal (fox, octopus) metaphors for cunning intelligence invoked by the term mêtis, reference “the camouflage fish” to describe the act of blending in through an overlay of patterns. They also describe “becoming-imperceptible” as “to be like everybody else,” “to go unnoticed,” and as having a “essential relation” to “movement,” which is often “below and above the threshold of perception” (279–81).3 One colleague and pianist of mine responded with the singular word “VERBOTEN!” when asked if he had ever heard of the piece played by a performer using two hands.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2023-10-20
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2023.2232774
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 22 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.14325/mississippi/9781628461176.001.0001
  2. 10.7208/chicago/9780226924601.001.0001
  3. 10.1080/10510974.2015.1122657
  4. 10.7208/chicago/9780226218359.001.0001
  5. 10.4324/9780203077887
  6. 10.18061/dsq.v40i1.7224
  7. 10.1177/1466138104044376
  8. 10.1080/15295038609366628
  9. 10.1080/09687590120070079
  10. 10.1525/jm.2010.27.2.135
  11. 10.5401/healthhist.13.2.0013
  12. 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-79
  13. 10.1086/448734
  14. 10.1163/156916306777835394
  15. 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-233
  16. 10.1525/dcqr.2015.4.3.70
  17. 10.1080/07393180216566
  18. 10.18574/nyu/9781479899081.001.0001
  19. 10.1093/oso/9780190871208.001.0001
  20. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199766451.001.0001
  21. 10.1080/14791421003759174
  22. 10.18061/dsq.v40i1.7222
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →