Abstract

ABSTRACTThe unique experience of Black Americans in the United States produces a physical and cultural space with a long history of misuse, commodification, and theft of the Black imagination and Black culture. These spaces, which also historically complicate notions of privatization and ownership, are replicated online today. In this essay, we propose the corner as a lens through which to interrogate whether Black networks online potentially produce a rhetorical digital commons and, further, whether the theory and practice of “the commons” adequately make space for the particular historical reality of Black America. To do so, we focus on three social media platforms wherein Black digital praxis meets the possibility of the corner: TikTok, Twitter, and Black Planet. These digital corners provide lessons that center the Black experience on- and offline, and point toward possibilities and limitations in our digital future. Ultimately we argue that the corner contradicts hegemonic modes of white supremacy in public spaces while also spotlighting the brutal realities of gentrification, commodification, and theft that fortify the exploitation of Black communities.KEYWORDS: Black/African American rhetoricdigital commonsdigital rhetoricsocial media Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We use Black liberation here to reference freeing Black persons from multiple forms of political, social, and economic subjugation. Black liberation movements, theories, and theologies have been espoused by numerous organizations. Here. though, we reference any orientation toward this perspective whether explicitly named by individuals or simply inferred through their online activities. See Stokley Carmicheal’s “Toward Black Liberation” and Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor’s From# BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation.2 See André Brock, Jr.’s Distributed Blackness, especially chapter four, for an insightful analysis on breaking the dichotomy of ratchetry and antiracism.3 See Nakamura 181–93.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2023-05-27
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2023.2200704
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4324/9780367855055-15
  2. 10.1080/17439884.2021.2018608
  3. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447395
  4. 10.4324/9781410617385
  5. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  6. 10.1080/00335630.2020.1744182
  7. 10.18574/nyu/9781479820375.001.0001
  8. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00398.x
  9. 10.18574/9781479845453-019
  10. 10.30687/978-88-6969-534-6/010
  11. 10.14763/2020.4.1530
  12. 10.1215/01642472-20-2_71-125
  13. 10.18574/nyu/9781479892464.001.0001
  14. 10.1177/0894439320914853
  15. 10.16997/wpcc.917
  16. 10.1080/23736992.2020.1736077
  17. 10.31269/triplec.v9i2.253
  18. 10.1080/14680777.2021.1952468
  19. 10.1007/BF02804510
  20. 10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001
  21. 10.2307/j.ctv2ckjpp9.27
  22. 10.1177/1461444816663485
  23. 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1437203
  24. 10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.578
  25. 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1575449
  26. 10.1177/1350508417713217
  27. 10.1177/14614448221080480
  28. 10.1080/10999949.2018.1532757
  29. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x
  30. 10.18574/nyu/9781479808373.003.0007
  31. 10.1177/20563051211038236
  32. 10.26522/ssj.v14i2.2243
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →