Disruptive Communication in Political Campaigning: On the Rhetoric of Metanoic Reflexivity

Stefan Iversen Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University

Abstract

Communicative acts that deliberately disrupt how an audience understands them as either fiction or nonfiction are well-known phenomena. Still, the rhetoric of such disruptions has yet to be systematically investigated. This essay treats the experience of such disruptions as a distinct form of reflexivity, conceptualizing it as metanoic reflexivity. Drawing on recent work on fictionality theory and on theories of metanoia, the essay uses this concept to describe the reading effect that is produced when a rhetor uses nonconventional forms of fictionality to disrupt how an audience ascribes relevance to a communicative act. Through readings of Democratic campaign rhetoric from the US presidential election of 2020, the essay directs attention to how this reflexivity has moved from artistic practices to the communicative mainstream, investigates how it operates, and discusses its potential deliberative ramifications.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2022-08-08
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2022.2061585
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Strange Narrators in Contemporary Fiction
  2. 10.5250/storyworlds.9.1-2.0121
  3. 10.1080/13825577.2016.1230389
  4. 10.1002/polq.12699
  5. 10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292
  6. 10.1353/nar.2015.0005
  7. This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling a…
  8. Memes in Digital Culture
  9. 10.1215/03335372-3160709
  10. 10.1080/03637757809375974
  11. 10.5325/style.53.4.0397
  12. 10.1177/1354856520923963
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →