Abstract

This essay investigates the extent to which an “ecological turn” in rhetorical studies—a turn toward systemic understandings of circulation and material interrelation—enables us to understand the ways that rhetors transform the networked public sphere. The essay argues that while ecological models have helped attune us to the complex, ever-shifting interrelations that constitute networked environments, they have demonstrated limitations. Specifically, ecological models have deemphasized (1) the historical specificity of rhetorical ecologies, (2) the role that social imaginaries play in structuring rhetorical ecologies, and (3) the ways that rhetors collectively invest in transforming rhetorical ecologies. Drawing on a qualitative study of activism on Twitter, this essay advocates the development of an infrastructural politics, an approach that emphasizes the ecological qualities of public rhetoric—dispersion, complexity, and emergence—while also attuning us to the collective and ethical dimensions of practicing rhetoric in today’s networked public sphere.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2020-10-19
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2020.1813321
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 8 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 13 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. College Composition and Communication
  8. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
  2. 10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect220
  3. 10.26818/9780814213803
  4. 10.1016/0277-9390(92)90001-R
  5. 10.1353/par.0.0047
  6. 10.18061/dsq.v31i3.1665
  7. 10.2307/j.ctt21668mb.12
  8. 10.2307/356121
  9. 10.2307/j.ctvcb5dnf
  10. 10.2307/377264
  11. 10.14361/dcs-2016-0105
  12. 10.4324/9780429266140-12
  13. 10.1002/16-0113.1
  14. 10.2307/j.ctt21668mb.10
  15. 10.4324/9781315303758-3
  16. 10.1080/0033563042000302153
  17. 10.2307/j.ctt21668mb
  18. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjqxd
  19. 10.4324/9781315203645-1
  20. 10.1163/9789004235694_002
  21. 10.1086/315932
  22. 10.1093/ccc/tcy030
  23. 10.5210/fm.v18i12.4653
  24. 10.2139/ssrn.2880402
  25. 10.1525/rh.1993.11.3.211
  26. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political
  27. 10.4324/9780203181096
  28. 10.1002/9781119265771.ch29
  29. 10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001
  30. 10.2307/j.ctvwrm691.79
  31. Wessler, Hartmut, and Rainer Freudenthaler. “Public Sphere.”Oxford Bibliographies, 23 Feb. 2011, www.oxfordbi…
  32. 10.1215/9780822372189
CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network →