Abstract

This article examines the ways evangelical rhetors Rachael Denhollander and Beth Moore engage in enclave deliberation regarding their community’s responses to sexual violence. Their contextual theological analysis proceeds through “casuistic tightening,” an inventive repurposing of casuistic stretching. Examining Denhollander’s and Moore’s rhetorical activity as a repurposing of casuistic practice helps explain how they productively revise theological abstractions—platitudes about forgiveness—that stymie robust deliberation, thus facilitating enclave deliberation. They confront the theological problem of an implicit-yet-operational antinomianism toward sexual violence, a problem that creates rhetorical difficulties: distinguishing sexual violence from sexual immorality generally and differentiating divine grace from human forgiveness in instances of assault. Negotiating this difficulty, Denhollander and Moore critique forgiveness as instant forgetting and magical healing, and they argue for a reinvigorated understanding of forgiveness.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2019-03-15
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2019.1580382
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4324/9780203359907
  2. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method
  3. 10.1007/s11109-015-9304-x
  4. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning
  5. 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00344.x
  6. 10.4324/9781315667102
  7. 10.1086/443783
  8. Going to Extremes. How Like Minds Unite and Divide
  9. The Language of Battered Women: A Rhetorical Analysis of Personal Theologies
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →