Political Animals:<i>Prosopopoeia</i>in the 1944 Presidential Election

Bryan Blankfield University of Pittsburgh

Abstract

This essay examines citizen correspondence to the White House following Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)’s “Fala speech.” During the 1944 presidential election, citizens often engaged in prosopopoeia by writing from the perspective of their pets and Roosevelt’s dog, Fala. I argue that citizens used this classical rhetorical figure to identify with the president and express their views of FDR’s character. Thus, animals offered a strategic, seemingly nonpolitical locus for expressing judgments about the election.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2017-08-08
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2017.1293283
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/10570311003767183
  2. 10.1080/01463370309370159
  3. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199764129.001.0001
  4. 10.1080/14791420.2010.523433
  5. Arguments about Animal Ethics
  6. 10.1080/15362426.2012.657063
  7. Rhetoric in Tooth and Claw: Language, Animals
  8. The Beast in the Boudoir: Petkeeping in Nineteenth-Century Paris
  9. 10.1080/00335637409383242
  10. 10.1080/10570319309374428
  11. 10.1080/00335639709384172
  12. 10.1080/00335639409384072
  13. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001
  14. 10.3138/CRAS-025-01-03
  15. 10.1632/pmla.2009.124.2.564
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →