Occult Retraction: Cornelius Agrippa and the Paradox of Magical Language

Chris Miles Eastern Mediterranean University

Abstract

Abstract Recent work on the relationship between rhetoric and magic has tended to pivot around the issue of magic's perceived identification of signifier and signified and what that might mean for its relationship to larger theological, empirical, and rhetorical approaches to language. This article seeks to problematize the assumptions underlying this issue through an examination of the work of Cornelius Agrippa (1486–1535), the author of what is commonly regarded as the European Renaissance's most influential magical text, De occulta philosophia libri tres (1533). In investigating the rhetorical strategies contained in Agrippa's famously ambiguous retraction of his occult works we may uncover an equally polysemic stance toward the ability of language to deal with both the everyday world and the realm of the sacred, a stance that uses textual instantiations of paradoxes of self-reference to forcefully undermine the apparently paradigmatic magical identification of signifier and signified. Acknowledgment I thank the Editor and anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments and suggestions on this article. Notes 1See Lehrich (Language of Demons and Angels) for a comprehensive analysis of the three books. 2See Zika for an overview of Reuchlin's influence on Agrippa. 3"…, lapides loquitor, caveant ne cerebrum illis excutiat." J.F.'s use of the alliterated "b"s in his English translation is perhaps more effective in its Anglo-Saxon brutality. 4Note that the quotation marks are not in the original Latin but added by J.F. for the English translation of 1651. 5Again, the quotation marks are an addition of J.F.'s English translation and are not in the Latin original. 6See Kneale and Kneale (228–231) for a discussion of the Liar's context in medieval logic. 7See Sainsbury (114–132), Simmons (2–7), and Hofstadter for accessible re-formulations from the nineteenth century onward. Additional informationNotes on contributorsChris Miles Chris Miles is Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Communication and Media Studies, Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazi Magusa, Mersin 10, Turkey. E-mail: chris.miles@emu.edu.tr

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2008-10-14
DOI
10.1080/02773940802375467
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (24)

  1. Twilit Grotto: Esoteric Archives
  2. 10.2307/2541132
  3. A Rhetoric of Motives
  4. The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology
  5. Journal of Advanced Composition
Show all 24 →
  1. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences
  2. Modern Occult Rhetoric: Mass Media and the Drama of Secrecy in the Twentieth Century
  3. 10.2307/2708291
  4. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
  5. Mysticism and Language
  6. Rhetoric, Cultural Studies, and Literacy: Selected Papers from the 1994 Conference of the…
  7. 10.2307/2861884
  8. The Development of Logic
  9. 10.1007/BF01512650
  10. The Occult Mind: Magic in Theory and Practice
  11. The Language of Demons and Angels: Cornelius Agrippa's Occult Philosophy
  12. Agrippa and the Crisis of Renaissance Thought
  13. From Virile Woman to WomanChrist: Studies in Medieval Religion and Literature
  14. Paradoxes
  15. 10.1017/CBO9780511551499
  16. 10.1163/9789004247314
  17. Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance
  18. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition
  19. 10.2307/751134