Abstract

Abstract This article adds to the growing body of feminist scholarship critiquing Robert J. Connors’ assertion that the entrance of women into higher education in the nineteenth century contributed to the decline of oratory and debate. It contradicts and complicates Connors’ claim by highlighting the efforts of Mary Yost, who taught English at Vassar College during the first two decades of the twentieth century. Yost promoted debate both in the classroom and in extracurricular activities, and she crafted a feminist theory of argument quite distinct from the traditional type of argument that Connors argues was displaced after women entered higher education.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2005-06-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940509391317
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. College English
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Relation of Structural and Functional Psychology to Philosophy
  2. 10.1037/10903-000
  3. 10.2307/2917917
    Modern Language Notes  
  4. 10.2307/358639
  5. Reclaiming Rhetorica: Women in the Rhetorical Tradition
  6. 10.1080/03637759509376345
  7. 10.1016/S0148-0685(79)91809-8
  8. Available Means: An Anthology of Women's Rhetoric(s)
  9. 10.1080/00335631909360744
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →