Presence as argument in the public sphere

Alan G. Gross University of Minnesota

Abstract

Abstract Chaim Perelman's concept of presence is extended and enriched by applying it to a historical museum exhibit that commemorated a watershed of Austrian history, the Anschluss of 1938. To understand the argumentative effect of presence in this exhibit, new rhetorical categories are deployed: foreground and background, space, and time. These are managed in the interest of an ideological position: to free the Austrian conscience and consciousness from the burden of memory created by the disproportionate participation of Austrians in the Holocaust. Finally, a basic problem with presence is addressed: its apparent incompatibility with any form of rational argumentation.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2005-03-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940509391308
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (17)

  1. New York Times
  2. Ich Errinnere Mich Ganz Genau
  3. Hitler's Austria: Popular Sentiment in the Nazi Era, 1938–45
  4. Falter
  5. Rendevous Wien
Show all 17 →
  1. Imperfect Justice: Looted Assets, Slave Labor, and the Unfinished Business of World War II
  2. Chaim Perelman
  3. Hermann Czech: Das Architektonische Objecte
  4. The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement and Response
  5. Still Alive: A Holocaust Girlhood Remembered
  6. From Prejudice to Persecution: A History of Austrian Anti‐Semitism
  7. The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument
  8. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
  9. Wien Acktuell
  10. Das Reichs‐Sippenamt Entscheidet: Rassenbiologie im National Sozialismus
  11. Maus: A Survivor's Tale. My Father Bleeds History
  12. Wien 1938