Abstract

Abstract This essay argues that the genealogy of the schism between poetics and rhetoric can be understood best by contrasting the attitudes of Plato and Aristotle towards the social impact of the poetic tradition with those of Isocrates. Plato seeks to discipline the process of poetic and political enculturation by splitting mimesis as representation from mimesis as performative imitation and audience identification. Aristotle completes Plato's Utopian project by constructing a hierarchy wherein representational mimesis of the tragic plot in the Poetics is central to a philosophical life, while mimesis as performative imitation of style in the Rhetoric is of marginal utility. In so doing, he counters Isocrates’ performative conception of speech education, according to which identification and performance both activate and sustain one's civic identity.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2000-06-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940009391180
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 6 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/cq/48.2.447
  2. 10.1163/156852553X00028
  3. Norms of Rhetorical Culture.
  4. 10.2307/283751
  5. Preface to Plato.
  6. 10.1017/S0009838800020541
  7. 10.1353/ajp.1997.0029
  8. Literacy and Paideia in Ancient Greece.
CrossRef global citation count: 15 View in citation network →