Abstract

Abstract This article explores the ways in which Romantic literary theory offers contemporary rhetoricians a balanced answer to the question of audience, . an answer that allows for prose which reflects a private vision at the same time that it strives for social transformation. In connecting Coleridge's and Keats's hostile reactions to their nineteenth‐century readers with current expressivist theories, especially the work of Peter Elbow, the need to avoid audience at certain stages in the writing process becomes apparent. Yet ultimately the most powerful writing is audience‐centered, as Shelley's A Defence of Poetry illustrates through its call for imaginative empathy.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2000-03-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940009391176
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

References (28) · 4 in this index

  1. The Making of English Reading Audiences 1790–1832
  2. Composition Studies/Freshman English News
  3. A Rhetoric of Motives.
  4. Biographia Uteraria.
  5. Coleridge's Miscellaneous Criticism.
Show all 28 →
  1. The Portable Coleridge.
  2. Unpublished Letters of Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
  3. 10.2307/377789
  4. Writing without Teachers.
  5. The Economy of Literary Form.
  6. Journal of Advanced Composition
  7. College English
  8. Romancing Rhetorics: Social Expressivist Perspectives on the Teaching of Writing.
  9. Letters of John Keats.
  10. John Keats: The Complete Poems.
  11. Redpath
  12. College English
  13. The Young Romantics and Critical Opinion 1807–1824.
  14. Shelley's Poetry and Prose.
  15. Shelley, Percy Bysshe.AdonaisEdited by: Reiman. 388–406.
  16. _____.A Defence of Poetry.Edited by: Reiman. 478–508.
  17. _____. “On Love.”. Edited by: Reiman. 473–474.
  18. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  19. Romanticism: Points of View.
  20. 10.2307/1179694
  21. Composition/Rhetoric: A Synthesis.
  22. Rhetoric Review
  23. Composition Studies/Freshman English News