Abstract

T his paper is an effort-which none of the characters in the dialogue maketo listen carefully to Socrates' most famous attack on rhetoric. This locus classicus is found in the Gorgias within the opening pages (461-466) of Socrates' conversation with Polus. In it he charges that rhetoric, Gorgias' skill, is a defective art and no more than base sucking up or flattery. He completes his condemnation by likening rhetoric, as Shakespeare's Faulconbridge does, a millennium and a half later, to sweet, sweet poison for the age's tooth, (King John, I, I), a debased confection in place of healthy food. It is not only characters in the dialogue who fail to make a searching inquiry into Socrates' condemnation. Many rhetors since that time, smarting from the sting of what Plato has Socrates say about rhetoric, have taken the passage as unproblematically expressing a blanket condemnation of rhetoric. But I believe it is not necessary to read Socrates' condemnation of rhetoric in that fashion, and I attempt a reading in which the condemnation is less absolute. In the interest of disclosure I should say that I undertake this analysis in an Aristotelian spirit. My interest in the passage began with Aristotle's allusion to it in the opening sentence of his Art of Rhetoric (1354a) and continues to be guided by what I believe Aristotle has to teach about rhetoric. It is also guided by a realization that Plato, a dramatic poet, achieves his effect, in dramas that have little overt action, almost entirely by rhetoric, that is, by the creation of a coherent voice through which we approach each character. Whatever Plato's ultimate understanding of the relation of wisdom and art (Roochnik), any argument that Plato has contempt for rhetoric must, sooner or later, deal with his constant and loving use of it in his work. The passage in question forms the first part-about a fifth of the bulk-of Socrates' dialogic encounter with Polus. This paper is thus limited to reflection on a fragmentary part of that encounter, for Socrates' condemnation of rhetoric emerges in four Stephanus pages. Nevertheless, it is a fragment that, like all of the pieces of a Platonic dialogue, spirals into place in the larger encounter and beyond that in the dialogue as a whole. I argue that our assessment of Socrates' argument is decisively affected by our grasp of the dramatic context in which it appears in several decisive ways. One obvious event that demands dramatic explanation is Polus' intervention in what had been a discussion between Gorgias himself and Socrates and his subsequent ineptness. Indeed, Polus is so inept that the pages barely qualify as part of a conversation, or at least a conversation with Polus. What we have is

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
1999-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773949909391138
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (46)

  1. Metaphysics
  2. Ethica Nichomachea.
  3. Ars Rhetorica.
  4. Le probleme de l'etre chez Aristote.
  5. 10.5840/ancientphil19911123
    Ancient Philosophy  
Show all 46 →
  1. Philosophy and Rhetoric
  2. St. John's Review
  3. Plato's Sophist: The Professor of Wisdom
  4. Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing.
  5. The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece.
  6. Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece.
  7. The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens.
  8. Plato's Gorgias: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary.
  9. 10.1080/10570317309373787
    Western Journal for Speech Communication  
  10. 10.1080/10417947609372331
    Southern Speech Communication Journal  
  11. Greek Rhetoric Before Aristotle.
  12. Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato's Phaedrus.
  13. Gorgias. 1982. “Encomium of Helen.”. Edited by: MacDowell, D.M. London: Bristol Classical Press of Gerald Duc…
  14. 10.1080/10417947209372169
    Southern Speech Communication Journal  
  15. Plato: Gorgias.
    Clarendon Plato Series  
  16. Isocrates. 1929. “Against the Sophists.”. Edited by: Norlin, J. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Loeb Cla…
  17. _____. 1929. “Antidosis.”. Edited by: Norlin, J. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Loeb Classical Library
  18. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured.
  19. 10.2307/1088457
    Phoenix  
  20. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy
  21. The Sophistic Movement.
  22. Yale Law Journal
  23. Interpretation
  24. 10.1017/S0009838800008430
    Classical Quarterly  
  25. 10.1017/S0009840X00239048
    Classical Quarterly  
  26. Platonic Writings, Platonic Readings
  27. Platonis Opera
  28. _____. 1959. “Gorgias.”. Edited by: Dodds, E.R. Oxford: Clarendon Press of Oxford University Press.
  29. Platonis Opera
  30. Platonis Opera
  31. A Friendly Companion to Plato's Gorgias.
  32. Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece, Studies in Rhetoric/Communication.
  33. Writing Histories of Rhetoric
  34. Speaking for the Polis: Isocrates’ Rhetorical Education.
    Studies in Rhetoric/Communication
  35. Of Art and Wisdom: Plato's Understanding of Techne.
  36. The Beginnings of Greek Rhetorical Theory: Disciplining the Logos in Classical Greece.
  37. Theory, Text, Context: Issues in Greek Rhetoric and Oratory
  38. Protagoras and Logos, Studies in Rhetoric/Communication,
  39. Quarterly Journal of Speech
  40. 10.2307/292782
    American Journal of Philology  
  41. The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and their Successors.