Perceiving rhetorical style: Toward a framework for criticism

Neil R. Leroux

doi:10.1080/02773949209390969

Rhetoric Society Quarterly Sep 1992

Perceiving rhetorical style: Toward a framework for criticism

Neil R. Leroux

Abstract

Rhetorical criticism, as it has developed over the past five decades or so, has taken on many agendas-for example, neo-Aristotelian criticism, movement studies, dramatistic criticism, genre criticism-all of which have been attempts to apply, reconstruct, or improve on a long tradition. What is striking about this body of critical literature is that none of it takes very seriously one of the paramount concerns of that tradition-namely, style. Indeed, a survey of the periodical literature shows that there persists a fundamental neglect of in both the theory and the practice of rhetorical criticism.1 Various theoretical and critical practices represented in this body of literature suggest that is a frustratingly elusive and amorphous creature, stubbornly resisting description. Most of the material does not venture much beyond theory and is, for the critic, consequently inadequate, for it falls short of a level of analysis that would reveal how rhetoric works. As a result, rhetorical criticism does not provide a useful critical approach to reading a discursive text. In one respect, this shows that some incisive remarks about the importance of in criticism and the neglect thereof which Donald Bryant made over thirty years ago have been either disregarded or forgotten. Moreover, I argue that both the interpretation of discourse (criticism) and the production of discourse (composition) can profit from careful attention to rhetorical style. For if, as Bryant2 has suggested, style is the final elaboration of meaning, then surely is the initial encounter through which auditors apprehend meaning. Does it not seem reasonable that ought play a major role in the critical act of the analysis of discourse? However, granting that has been neglected, I now must explain what I mean by style. To begin, Bryant has urged us to regard it not as the mere department of elocutio but that in dispositio and even inventio participate. Bryant argues: It is difficult at best to consider the functioning language of discourse without becoming involved at once with the ordering of the discourse. Furthermore, if we go beyond the static idea of disposition as arrangement, to the potentially dynamic idea of disposition as disposing, as Wagner thought necessary, we may conclude that for the critic the two names signify the two lenses for a stereopticon view of a

Journal: Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published: 1992-09-01
DOI: 10.1080/02773949209390969
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis voice and style
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

Atkinson et al. (2008)

Presence and Global Presence in Genres of Self-Presentation: A Framework for Co…

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Manolescu (2004)

Formal Propriety as Rhetorical Norm

Argumentation
Leroux (1998)

The Rhetor's perceived situation: Luther's Invocavit sermons

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (48)

1990. “Style in Rhetorical Criticism: The Case of Martin Luther's Vernacular Sermons”. University of Illinois.
Gray Bennison (1969)

Style: The Problem and its Solution

↗
Bryant Donald C. (1968)

Essays on Rhetorical Criticism
Wagner Russell H. (1944)

Studies in Speech and Drama in Honor of Alexander M. Drummond
Bryant Donald C. (1957)

Western Speech

Show all 48 →

Buffon (1952)

The Art of the Writer
Vickers Brian (1988)

In Defence of Rhetoric
Bryant Donald C. (1965)

Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Argumentation
10.1080/00335638809383839

↗
Burke Kenneth (1968)

Counter‐Statement
Perelman Chaim (1969)

The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
Carpenter R. H. (1972)

10.1080/01463377209369018

Today's Speech ↗
Winterowd W. R. (1972)

Philosophy and Rhetoric
Ivie Robert L. (1979)

10.1080/10510977909368026

Central States Speech Journal ↗
Burke, Kenneth. 1972.Dramatism and Development, 16Barre, Maine: Clark University Press.
10.1080/00335637909383490

↗
Burke, Kenneth.Dramatism and Development16
1969.A Rhetoric of Motives, 1969Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bostdorff Denise M. (1985)

PREITEXT
Bonds Mark Evan (1991)

Wordless Rhetoric: Musical Form and the Metaphor of the Oration

Studies in the History of Music 4 ↗
Weinstock Herbert (1981)

Chopin: The Man and His Music
O'Malley John J. (1983)

Renaissance Eloquence
Weaver Richard M. (1953)

The Ethics of Rhetoric
Philo (1984)

Aufstieg und Niedergang der Roemischen Welt
Benveniste Emile (1971)

Problems in General Linguistics
Genette Gerard (1980)

Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method
Karon Louisc A. (1976)

Philosophy and Rhetoric
Brandt, William J. 1970.The Rhetoric of Argumentation, 153Indianapolis: Bobbs‐Merrill.
Quinn, Arthur. 1982.Figures of Speech: Sixty Ways to Turn A Phrase, 97fSalt Lake City: G. M. Smith.
Cicero. 1964.Rhetorica ad Herennium, Edited by: Caplan, Harry. Vol. IV, 47London: Heinemann. xxx
Watson John Selby (1910)

Institutes of Oratory
AdH
Q
Blettner Elizabeth (1983)

Philosophy and Rhetoric
Quinn, Arthur.Figures of Speech7–13.
10.1080/00335636909382941

↗
10.1086/447801

↗
AdH
Q
Conley, Thomas. 1990.Rhetoric in the European Tradition, 120–24. New York: Longman.
Q
AdH
Haile H. G. (1976)

Publication of the Modern Language Association
Romans
Doberstein John W. (1959)

Luther's Works, vol 51: Sermons J
Steimle, A. 1916–43.Luther's Works, 6 vols, 391ffPhiladelphia: A. J. Holman. 2
WA
Augustine (1958)

On Christian Doctrine

CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Perceiving rhetorical style: Toward a framework for criticism

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

References (48)

Related Articles