Rhetoric Society Quarterly Jan 1990

Assent, Dissent, and Rhetoric in Science

R. Allen Harris

Abstract

Socrates, of course, does not mean to venerate the art of discourse here. He is telling Phaedrus that there is discourse and there is truth. Once you have gone out and dug up the truth somewhere else, you apply the art of discourse to it and fashion a persuasive argument that will permit others to partake also of the truth. Two immediate implications follow from Socrates' position. First, only when the art of discourse, rhetoric, is put to the task of selling truth to the benighted does it become real. Second, rhetoric is necessary human affairs just to the extent that humans are unable to apprehend truth directly. It is an unfortunate evil, required because we are rationally degenerate creatures. Both positions have remained very popular over the intervening two millenia. Bitzer, for instance, can still say that in the best of all possible worlds there would be communication perhaps, but not rhetoric;'I we get our truth and knowledge somewhere else, and only our lack of perfection prevents us from casting rhetoric out of the garden. But there is an important lesson those two millenia that can help us to see the Spartan's words another light: the sources of truth which rhetoric has been obliged to serve have changed dramatically-from Socrates' dialectic and Aristotle's apodeixis, to Christianity's biblical exegesis and divine revelation, to the current authority on matters of knowledge and truth, Science. This rotation of leading roles while the supporting actress, Lady Rhetoric, remains constant indicates that the real art of discourse is connected with truth not because of human degeneracy, but because of precisely the reverse, because of our spark of perfection, because we are truth-seeking, knowledge-making creatures who sometimes get it right. We occasionally do something important with rhetoric: we find truth and we build knowledge out of it. When we manage the trick, though, we are so eager to dissociate it from all the foul and inane things we also do with rhetoric that we give the process another name. But these other names are clearly just aliases for rhetoric, or for some subset of rhetorical interests. Dialectic, for instance, is essentially questing debate. Apodeixis is distinguished only by the level of rigor Aristotle demands of the argumentation, not by any qualitative difference. Exegesis is rhetorical analysis. The only possible gap to this pattern is divine revelation, whose capacity to generate truth I will leave to more knowledgeable commentators, pausing only to notice that, true or not, reports of revelation usually involve a fair amount of persuasive machinery-burning bushes, hovering spirits, and the like. In any case, science is certainly no exception.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
1990-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773949009390867
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Harris (1998)
    A note on the Max Planck effect
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (76) · 2 in this index

  1. Bitzer Lloyd F. (1968)
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  2. White Eugene E. (1980)
    Rhetoric in Transition: Studies in the Nature and Uses of Rhetoric
  3. McGuire M. (1980)
    10.1080/10417948009372445
    Southern Speech Communications Journal  ↗
  4. Jerry E. Claire (1987)
    Visions of Rhetoric: History, Theory and Criticism
  5. Gleick, James. 1987.Chaos: Making a New Science, 184New York: Viking Books.
Show all 76 →
  1. Booth Wayne C. (1971)
    The Prospect of Rhetoric: Report of the National Development Project
  2. 1978.Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, 260London: Verso. [1975])
  3. Cook Tom (1980)
    PREITEXT
  4. Campbell John Angus (1970)
    Quarterly Journal of Speech
  5. 10.1080/00335637509383301
     ↗
  6. 10.1080/00335638609383782
     ↗
  7. Wamick Barbara (1983)
    10.1080/10417948309372586
    The Southern Speech Communication Journal  ↗
  8. Halloran (1984)
    The birth of molecular biology: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of scienti…
    Rhetoric Review
  9. 10.1080/00335638609383764
     ↗
  10. Anderson Wilda (1984)
    Between the Library and the Laboratory: The Language of Chemistry in Eighteenth Century France
  11. 10.1080/00335638809383825
     ↗
  12. Zappen James (1987)
    The Technical Writing Teacher
  13. Rosenthal Robert (1976)
    Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research
  14. 10.1037/0003-066X.33.11.1005
     ↗
  15. Boslough, John. 1985.Stephen Hawking's Universe: An Introduction to the Most Remarkable Scientist of our Time…
  16. Greenstein, George. 1984.Frozen Star: Of Pulsars, Black Holes, and the Fate of Stars, 362–6. New York: New Am…
  17. Chomsky, Noam and Ronat, Mitsou. 1979.Language and Responsibility, 171New York: Pantheon Books.
  18. Holloa, Gerald. 1988.Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought,, rev. ed., 79Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  19. Secord James A. (1982)
    Victorian Studies
  20. Gross (1985)
    The Form of the Experimental Paper: A Realization of the Myth of Induction
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  21. 10.1177/016555158801400202
     ↗
  22. de Grazia Alfred (1966)
    The Velikovsky Affair
  23. Westfall Richard S.
    Science
  24. Glashow Sheldon
    The Sciences
  25. Kanigel Robert
    The Sciences
  26. Lewin Roger (1987)
    Bones of Contention: Controversies in the Search for Human Origins
  27. Taubes Gary (1988)
    Nobel Dreams: Power, Deceit, and the Ultimate Experiment
  28. Broad William (1983)
    Betrayers of the Truth
  29. Muller, Richard. 1988.Nemesis, the Death Star: The Story of a Scientific Revolution, 3–9. New York: Weidenfel…
  30. Browne Malcolm (1988)
    The New York Times
  31. Raup, David. 1987.The Nemesis Affair: A Story of the Death of Dinosaurs and the Ways of Science, 145New York:…
  32. Scheffler, Israel. 1967.Science and Subjectivity, 84Indianapolis: Bobbs‐Merrill.
  33. James, William. 1975.The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to ‘Pragmatism’, 40Cambridge: Harvard University Press. […
  34. Feyerabend, Paul K. 1981.Realism, Rationalism & Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers 1, 9Cambridge: Cambri…
     ↗
  35. James, William.The Meaning of Truth41
  36. James, William. 1975.Pragmatism, 97Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [1907]). James’ italics.
  37. Cline, Barbara Lovett. 1983.The Men who Made a New Physics, 34Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1965])
  38. Einstein, Albert. 1983.Sidelights on Relativity, Edited by: Jeffrey, G. B. and Perret, W. 28New York: Dover B…
  39. Rosenthal‐Schneider, Ilse. 1983.Reality and Scientific Truth, Edited by: Braun, Thomas. 74Detroit: Wayne Stat…
  40. 10.1037/11061-000
     ↗
  41. Enos Richard Leo (1976)
    10.1080/10417947609372331
    Southern Speech Communication Journal  ↗
  42. Scott Robert (1967)
    10.1080/10510976709362856
    Central States Speech Journal  ↗
  43. (1976)
    10.1080/10510977609367902
    Central States Speech Journal  ↗
  44. Rorty, Richard. 1979.Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, 157Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  45. Davies, P. C W. and Brown, J. 1988.Superstrings: A Theory of Everything?, 208London: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980.Metaphors we Live by, 4ffChicago: University of Chicago Press.
  47. Davies and Brown.Superstrings157
  48. Salam, Abdut.SuperstringsEdited by: Davies and Brown. 179
  49. Feynman, Richard.SuperstringsEdited by: Davies and Brown. 194
  50. Thouless Robert H. (1935)
    British Journal of Psychology
  51. Cole K. C (1987)
    The New York Times Magazine
  52. James, William.Pragmatism97
  53. James, William.The Will to Believe26
  54. Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., eds. “Normal Science and its Dangers”. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: P…
  55. 1981.Problems of Empiricism, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, 142London: Cambridge University Press.
  56. Kellen Konrad (1965)
    Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes
  57. Jacob Margaret C. (1988)
    The Cultural Meaning of the Scientific Revolution
  58. Drake Stillman (1967)
    Two Chief World Systems
  59. Drake, Stillman, ed. 1987.Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, 200New York: Doubleday. [1610]: 68 Jacob, 25.
  60. Butterfield, Herbert. 1957.The Origins of Modern Science,, rev. ed., 83New York: Micmillan.
  61. Feyerabend.Against Method81
  62. Gould Stephen Jay (1986)
    The New York Review of Booh
  63. Turner Frank M. (1986)
    lsis
  64. Landan Larry (1984)
    Science and Values
  65. Pluck, Max. 1949.Scientific Autobiography and Other PapersEdited by: Gaynor, F. 33–4. New York publisher
  66. 1970.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,, 2nd ed., 148Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  67. Wallace Karl (1963)
    The Quarterly Journal of Speech
  68. Stent Gurther (1968)
    Science
  69. Novick Aaron (1966)
    Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology
  70. Hacking, Ian. 1983.Representing and Intervening, 150Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     ↗
  71. Mill, John Stuart. 1978.On Liberty, 34Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. [1859]):
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  2. Poroi Feb 2026
    Using Stasis Theory as a Heuristic for Examining Epistemological Dilemmas in a Post-Truth Landscape ↗
    Bruce Bowles
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  3. Rhetorica Jan 2026
    The Daimonion of Isocrates: Anti-Socratic Polemics and the Power of Politikoi Logoi in the Philippos ↗
    Tobias Hirsch
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2025
    The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958 ↗
    Christopher W. Tindale
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis revision argument collaborative writing editorial matter
  5. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2024
    Populist Rhetorics Case Studies and a Minimalist Definition ↗
    Arthur E. Walzer
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument digital rhetoric social media disability studies public rhetoric editorial matter