Abstract

The paper explores some fundamental differences In the Greek and Roman conceptions of rhetoric. These differences cam be modeled by a brief philological analysis of major terms significant in the history of rhetoric. In turn, this type of Inquiry suggests what some available conceptions of rhetorical experience are and how they might be carefully treated.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
1980-06-01
DOI
10.1080/02773948009390570
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

References (9)

  1. 1972.A Lexicon Abridged from Liddell and Scott's Greek‐English Lexicon, 621Oxford: Oxford U. Press at the Cla…
  2. Holmberg, Carl. August 1976.Being and Rhetoric: A Restoration of Rhetoric and of Human, A Rhetorical Rhetoric…
  3. Lechner, Joan. 1962.Renaissance Concepts of the Commonplaces, 143ffNew York: Pageant Press.
  4. Bitzer and Black, eds. 1971.The Prospect of Rhetoric, 54–5. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.
  5. Main Currents in Modern Thought
Show all 9 →
  1. Ursprung and Gegenwart Kommentarband
  2. Mickunas. “Civilizations,”. 181
  3. Mickunas. “Civilizations,”. 182 columns 1 and 2
  4. Mickanua. “Civilizations,”. 182 column 1