Abstract

A concept in Aristotle’s thought that is both politically and rhetorically significant for all life forms is a sign (sêmeion). Yet, scholarship has historically left underexplored how Aristotle positions the utility of a sign across human and nonhuman animal domains. Rereading his presentation of signs in the Rhetoric in light of his statements on the use of sign-inference through physiognomy in Prior Analytics elucidates how rhetoric’s interest in persuasive things makes use of a sign’s physicality. In so doing, Aristotle demonstrates how rhetoric enables political communities to grapple with an inescapable nonhuman status.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2021-10-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2021.1963039
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric
Show all 8 →
  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence
  2. 10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-nicomachean_ethics.1926
  3. ———. “Analytics.”Aristotlés Prior and Posterior Analytics, translated by W.D. Ross, Clarendon P, 1949, pp. 99–678.
  4. 10.2307/293663
  5. 10.1086/287530
    Philosophy of Science  
  6. 10.1353/par.2003.0028
    Philosophy & Rhetoric  
  7. 10.1163/15733823-00221p01
    Early Science and Medicine  
  8. 10.1163/156852889X00125
    Phronesis  
  9. 10.1080/15358593.2016.1183882
  10. 10.1007/978-1-349-20346-8_1
  11. 10.2307/291223
    The American Journal of Philology  
  12. 10.1163/156852889X00215
    Phronesis  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →