Abstract

During the 1880s, the Knights of Labor united most workers regardless of craft or trade. They also organized African American workers and women. This essay uncovers how the Knights maintained unity by analyzing speeches given at their annual conventions from 1885-1890. Leaders defined male Knights as chivalric, self-sacrificing, and battle-tested. After identifying the elements of the rhetoric of knighthood, I then explain how the rhetoric offered only ironic inclusion to white women and excluded Chinese and Eastern European immigrants. This argument builds rhetorical scholarship on inclusion and exclusion in social movements by theorizing its partial and ironic modes.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2019-07-03
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2019.1618114
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1353/par.2003.0006
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  2. 10.1086/494385
    Signs  
  3. A Grammar of Motives
  4. 10.1080/01463373.2010.541333
  5. 10.1080/00335630701326852
  6. 10.1215/9780822390237
  7. 10.1086/367918
  8. 10.4324/9780203359259
  9. 10.2307/2712349
  10. 10.1080/10570310802635013
    Western Journal of Communication  
  11. 10.1080/10570314.2011.553875
    Western Journal of Communication  
  12. The Indispensable Enemy: Labor and the Anti-Chinese Movement in California
  13. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x
  14. 10.1080/10510979109368321
  15. 10.1080/0033563032000125322
  16. 10.1353/jowh.2010.0080
    Journal of Women’s History  
  17. 10.2307/1880768
    The Quarterly Journal of Economics  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →