Abstract

This article discusses two nineteenth-century rhetors who engaged in cultural persuasion through their respective lexicons. It argues that lexicography served an epideictic function in nineteenth-century culture, entering educational values and pervading print culture. Nineteenth-century lexicography functioned epideictically as a storehouse of cultural values and influenced the discourse of nineteenth-century rhetorics, evidenced in their concern with clarity, usage, and the disambiguation of language. But there is an acceptance and awareness of the inherent ambiguity of language in nineteenth-century rhetoric, which is also reflected in other satirical lexicons. The two poles of lexicography in theory and practice illustrate how dictionaries became a site of cultural dialogue and dissent.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2013-01-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2013.739494
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Unabridged Devil's Dictionary
  2. 10.1080/01463378509369608
  3. The Long Journey of Noah Webster
  4. 10.2307/2712538
    American Quarterly  
  5. 10.2307/378414
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →