Abstract

Writing centers have long been rich sites of critical inquiry into individualized instructional styles and methods. One of the great writing center debates involves directive versus nondirective tutoring styles and methods. While many writing center scholars have discussed the intricacies of directive or interventionist versus nondirective or minimalist pedagogical methods, few have examined the rhetorical implications of this important debate in relation to more classroom-based peer collaborations. This article rhetorically analyzes the literature on directive/nondirective methods and various approaches to tutoring writing, drawing pedagogical and rhetorical connections and implications useful for all teachers of writing and rhetoric.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2013-01-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2013.739497
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. College English
  2. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. Between Talk and Teaching: Reconsidering the Writing Conference
  2. The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action
  3. The Center Will Hold: Critical Perspectives on Writing Center Scholarship
  4. Corbett , Steven J.Bringing the Noise: Peer Power and Authority, On Location, 101 – 11 . Spigelman and Grobman .
  5. Teagan , Decker .Diplomatic Relations: Peer Tutors in the Writing Classroom, 17 – 30 . Spigelman and Grobman .
  6. The Everyday Writing Center: A Community of Practice
  7. 10.37514/WAC-J.2011.22.1.03
    The WAC Journal  
  8. 10.2307/358626
    College Composition and Communication  
  9. Liu , Barbara Little and Mandes , Holly .The Idea of a Writing Center Meets the Reality of Classroom-Based Tu…
  10. Melissa , Nicolas .A Cautionary Tale about ‘Tutoring’ Peer Response Groups, 112 – 25 . Spigelman and Grobman .
  11. 10.2307/377047
    College English  
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →