Rhetoric Review Jul 2012

“That's Beyond the Scope of This Paper”: Analyzing the Functions of a Familiar Phrase in Academic Writing

Teresa Thonney Columbia Basin College

Abstract

A single phrase––“beyond the scope of this paper”––is used by academic writers to accomplish various communicative moves in research articles. Writers use the phrase (1) to establish a territory and occupy a niche; (2) to introduce previous research into the conversation; (3) to recommend further research; and (4) to acknowledge limitations. An examination of its uses in scholarly articles from five disciplines suggests that “beyond the scope of this paper” is a useful phrase to introduce to students still learning how to claim the value and establish the focus of their academic writing.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2012-07-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2012.684002
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Gallagher (2011)
    Being There: (Re)Making the Assessment Scene
    College Composition and Communication
  2. McNamara et al. (2010)
    Linguistic Features of Writing Quality
    Written Communication
  3. VanderStaay et al. (2009)
    Close to the Heart: Teacher Authority in a Classroom Community
    College Composition and Communication
  4. Ryan et al. (2009)
    Theorizing Feminist Pragmatic Rhetoric as a Communicative Art for the Compositi…
    College Composition and Communication
  5. Eves (2005)
    A Recipe for Remembrance: Memory and Identity in African-American Women's Cookbooks
    Rhetoric Review
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. Agrawal Anup (2010)
    10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00279.x
    Journal of Economics & Management Strategy  ↗
  2. Bowker Lynne (2002)
    Working with Specialized Language: A Practical Guide to Using Corpora
     ↗
  3. Brown William M. (2011)
    10.3378/027.083.0205
    Human Biology  ↗
  4. Cortes Viviana (2004)
    10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
    English for Specific Purposes  ↗
  5. Datta Proyag (2009)
    10.1007/s00542-008-0711-3
    Microsystem Technologies  ↗
  6. Delpit Lisa (2006)
    10.1177/0022487105285966
    Journal of Teacher Education  ↗
  7. Geiger Emil J. (2011)
    10.1007/s00542-011-1323-x
    Microsystem Technologies  ↗
  8. Guenov Marin (2008)
    10.1080/09544820701213378
    Journal of Engineering Design  ↗
  9. Hennenberg K. J. (2010)
    10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01380.x
    Conservation Biology  ↗
  10. Holmes Richard (1997)
    10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5
    English for Specific Purposes  ↗
  11. Kostova Tatiana (2008)
    10.5465/AMR.2008.34422026
    Academy of Management Review  ↗
  12. Latham Scott (2009)
    10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00267.x
    Journal of Small Business Management  ↗
  13. Leonard Anne S. (2011)
    10.1242/jeb.047407
    Journal of Experimental Biology  ↗
  14. Melde Chris (2009)
    10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00157.x
    Criminology  ↗
  15. Pal Prem (2010)
    10.1007/s00542-009-0956-5
    Microsystem Technologies  ↗
  16. Peacock Matthew (2002)
    10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7
    System  ↗
  17. Penfold-Mounce Ruth (2011)
    10.1177/0038038510387199
    Sociology  ↗
  18. Petrek Derek J. (2008)
    10.1007/s00542-007-0445-7
    Microsystem Technologies  ↗
  19. Saarela Jan (2010)
    10.3378/027.082.0102
    Human Biology  ↗
  20. Saleh Joseph H. (2008)
    10.1080/09544820701213360
    Journal of Engineering Design  ↗
  21. Samraj Betty (2002)
    10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5
    English for Specific Purposes  ↗
  22. Schleppergrell Mary (2004)
    The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective
     ↗
  23. Weaver Simon (2010)
    10.1177/0038038509351624
    Sociology  ↗
  24. Ye Xiaoli (2008)
    10.1080/09544820802471123
    Journal of Engineering Design  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →