Abstract

This survey offers a forum for scholars who have been studying Asian rhetoric to express their views about some important issues in the discipline. Covering a variety of topics from the existing state of research in Asian rhetoric to the modes of inquiries and the development of scholarship in this area, the survey reveals that researchers must challenge the fundamental assumptions about rhetoric embedded in classical Western rhetorical theories to start a conversation between East and West. By representing different voices, the survey also invites deeper discussion of related issues among researchers in the field.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2004-04-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2302_5
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00028533.1993.11951559
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  2. 10.1080/00335639309384017
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  3. 10.1525/rh.1987.5.3.219
    Rhetorica  
  4. 10.1080/00028533.1992.11951544
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  5. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
    Language Learning  
  6. Kaplan, Robert "Foreword: What in the World Is Contrastive Rhetoric?" Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited and Rede…
  7. 10.1080/10570319309374467
    Western Journal of Communication  
  8. 10.1080/00335636109382453
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →