Rhetoric Review Mar 1998

Ars Rhetorica en Communitas: Reclaiming the voice of passionate expression in electronic writing

Elaine J. Lawless University of Missouri

Abstract

In this article I intend to share my experiences of teaching writingintensive courses at a large state university with the use of computers.' I want to present my positive experiences to the reader in such a way that will make you want to join me in exploring the myriad of possibilities of teaching with technology: ways that will free us, not constrict us-ways that will enhance learning and dialogue, not provide new ways of shutting down the inquisitive minds of students, but rather of expanding and enhancing all their possibilities and ours. Let me explain at the outset that the technologies I am advocating for teaching writing in writing-intensive literature and folklore courses are largely electronic mail formats and web sites for the distribution of assignments, for syllabi, for student writing, written assignments and peer reviews, and for the position of hypertext archives for class listservs.2 E-mail discussion listserv formats provide an easy way for everyone in the class to communicate automatically with every other member of the class, as well as with the instructor(s).3 Teachers, teaching assistants, tutors, and students can all be subscribed to the discussion listserv; whenever anyone on the list posts a memo addressed to the listserv, all persons subscribed to the list receive a copy of the entry. The listserv owner (generally, the teacher) controls who can be subscribed to the discussion list and who can participate in this electronic forum and how the discussion will operate. For example, in my descriptions below, I will illustrate how every student journal entry or writing assignment goes automatically to the computers of all the other students and myself. However, when I wish to communicate privately with a student or send her or him a graded paper, I can send that message only to that particular student simply by addressing the note to the individual student rather than to the entire list; similarly, when students are doing peer reviews of other students' papers, for privacy, they can post their comments only to the author of a paper, rather than to the entire class. In this paper I am advocating the use of the e-mail discussion list format because I believe in its capacity to better enable students to write well

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1998-03-01
DOI
10.1080/07350199809389098
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
classical rhetoric writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development digital rhetoric book reviews
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (17) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.2307/378378
     ↗
  2. 10.1016/0360-1315(95)00017-G
     ↗
  3. 10.2307/358177
     ↗
  4. hooks bell (1994)
    Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom
  5. _____ (1984)
    Feminist Theory from Margin to Center
Show all 17 →
  1. _____ (1990)
    Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural politics
  2. Kirshenblatt‐Gimblett Barbara (1996)
    Connected
  3. Lawless Elaine J. (1988)
    God's Peculiar People: Women's Voices and Folk Tradition in a Pentecostal Church
  4. _____ (1988)
    Handmaidens of The Lord: Women Preachers and Traditional Religion
    New Series
  5. _____ (1993)
    Holy Women, Wholly Women: Sharing Ministries Through Life Stories and Reciprocal Ethnography
    New Series
  6. _____ (1996)
    Women Preaching Revolution: Calling for Connection in a Disconnected Time
  7. Miller Carolyn R. (1993)
    Defining the New Rhetorics
    Sage Series in Written Communication 7
  8. Taylor Todd (1996)
    WPA: Writing Program Adminstration
  9. Turner, Victor. “Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites of Passage.”. Symposium on New Approaches t…
  10. White Andy (1996)
    The Writery: Newsletter of the Campus Writing Program
  11. Zappen et al. (1997)
    Rhetoric, community, and cyberspace
    Rhetoric Review
  12. Zimmerman Ray (1997)
    WPA: Writing Program Administration
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2023
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development writing program administration writing centers digital rhetoric literacy studies gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Apr 2022
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy creative writing writing across the curriculum teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing program administration technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric literacy studies gender and writing disability studies literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  4. Journal of Academic Writing Dec 2020
    Collaborating between Writing and STEM: Teaching Disciplinary Genres, Researching Disciplinary Interventions, and Engaging Science Audiences ↗
    Rachel C Riedner; Bill Briscoe; Alexander Van der Horst; Carol Hayes; Gary White
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy advanced composition writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development collaborative writing professional writing scientific writing empirical research race and writing book reviews
  5. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter