Reconsidering sophistic rhetoric in light of skeptical epistemology

George L. Pullman

doi:10.1080/07350199409359174

Rhetoric Review Sep 1994

Reconsidering sophistic rhetoric in light of skeptical epistemology

George L. Pullman Georgia State University

Abstract

The latest rehabilitation of the sophists, begun by Hegel and carried out with increasing dedication during this century (see Crowley, Enos, Guthrie, Hunt, Jarratt, Kerferd, Poulakos, De Romilly, Schiappa, Untersteiner), has improved our understanding of rhetorical theory and history. Despite, and in some ways because of, the nebulous quality of what they have left us, the sophists have become important primarily because they predate Plato and Aristotle and thus would seem to offer at least a fragmentary glimpse of rhetoric prior to its hypostatization in the classical period. The traditional thinking is that Platonic and Aristotelian rhetorical theory disciplined the sophists' extravagant practices, substantiated their unsubstantiated claims, and transformed their dithyrambic, mythic, magical, poetic discourse into a logical, rational theory of argumentation. In other words, Plato and Aristotle transformed mythos into logos; thus they were the fathers of rhetoric insofar as rhetoric was a respectable techno for the production of reasonable discourse. The philosophers rejected sophistic rhetoric on the grounds that it had no philosophical foundations from which its principles could be logically derived and safely taught. Thus they set about constructing a sound, philosophically based rhetoric by linking it carefully to, while dividing it just as carefully from, absolute knowledge (episteme). In both the Platonic and the Aristotelian rhetorical schemes, episteme provides the limits of rhetoric. In the Platonic case, absolute knowledge is a prerequisite for the application of rhetorical lore-one must employ dialectic in the service of absolute truth before one may use rhetoric to disseminate the truth (Phaedrus 265-66). In the Aristotelian case, rhetorical lore must be based on the first principles of persuasion, but must be employed when knowable matters are discussed-the closer one gets to fundamental principles, the further one gets from enthymemes, and thus the further one gets from rhetoric in the direction of scientific knowledge (Freese 1359b). If knowledge provides the limits for rhetorical theory and practice, then, in Platonic and Aristotelian terms, without both knowledge and a theory of knowledge, systematic rhetoric is impossible. This is why they dismissed sophistic rhetoric on the grounds that it ha(d) no rational account to give of the nature of the various things which it offer(ed) (Gorgias 465) and that it presented not an but the results of an art (Forster 183b). Because

Journal: Rhetoric Review
Published: 1994-09-01
DOI: 10.1080/07350199409359174
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (32) · 4 in this index

Aristotle (1982)

The “Art” of Rhetoric
_____ (1954)

The Rhetoric and Poetics
Bury R. G. (1949)

Sextus Empiricus.
Carter (1988)

Stasisandkairos: Principles of social construction in classical rhetoric∗

Rhetoric Review
10.2307/356396

↗

Show all 32 →

Enos Richard Leo (1987)

Search of Justice: The Indiana Tradition in Speech Communication
_____ (1976)

10.1080/10417947609372331

Southern Speech Communication ↗
_____ (1993)

Greek Rhetoric Before Aristotle
Forster E. S. (1978)

Aristotle: On Sophistical Refutations.
Groarke Leo (1990)

Greek Scepticism: Anti‐Realist Trends in Ancient Thought

↗
Gronbeck Bruce E. (1972)

10.1080/10417947209372169

Southern Speech Communication ↗
Guthrie W. K. C. (1971)

The Sophists

↗
Hamilton Edith (1961)

The Collected Dialogues of Plato

↗
Harkness James (1982)

This Is Not a Pipe.
Hegel G. W. (1914)

Lectures on the History of Philosophy
10.1080/00335632009379291

↗
Jarratt Susan C. (1991)

Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured
_____ (1987)

PRE/TEXTS
Kennedy George A. (1991)

Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse.
Kerferd George B. (1981)

The Sophistic Movement
Laertius Diogenes (1979)

Lives of the Philosophers.
Payne (1986)

Rhetoric, reality, and knowledge: A re‐examination of “Protagoras’ concept of r…

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Poulakos John (1990)

10.1080/10570319009374333

Western Journal of Speech Communication ↗
_____ (1983)

Philosophy and Rhetoric
Romilly Jacqueline de (1922)

The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens
Scenters‐Zapico (1993)

The case for the sophists

Rhetoric Review
Schiappa Edward (1991)

Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric
Schiappa (1991)

Sophistic rhetoric: Oasis or mirage?

Rhetoric Review
Sprague Rosamond Kent (1990)

The Older Sophists: A Complete Translation by Several Hands of the Fragments in Die Fragm…
Stough Charlotte L. (1969)

Greek Skepticism: A Study in Epistemology

↗
Freeman Kathleen (1954)

The Sophists
Untersteiner Mario (1954)

The Sophists

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Reconsidering sophistic rhetoric in light of skeptical epistemology

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (32) · 4 in this index

Related Articles