Rhetoric Review Sep 1992

Discourses of separation: The relation between rhetoric and poetics in the work of Hoyt Hudson and Herbert Wichelns

Annika Hallin Clemson University

Abstract

In his 1925 article Literary Criticism of Oratory, Herbert Wichelns, a scholar of rhetoric at Cornell, observed that, with respect to literary study, oratory had become either an outcast or a poor (181). Oratory's falling out of favor indicated to Wichelns that perceptions of discourse had been radically transformed. Intimating what the change might consist of, he wrote, [i]nvolved in it is some shift in the conception of oratory or of literature, or of both; nor can these conceptions have changed except in response to the of which oratory, as well as literature, is part (181). Scholars writing after Wichelns have frequently reported on the ill fate of oratory-and, more broadly, of rhetoric as the practice and study of some kinds of written as well as oral discourse-in American colleges. How had colleges by 1925 come to demote rhetoric to a position beneath literary critical study and literary works of fiction, drama, and poetry? As Wichelns suggested, rhetoric and literature shared some life, and our elaboration of their common history and context can help us account for rhetoric's condition. Some scholars have argued that the study and status of rhetoric in the college curriculum diminished as a strong interest in literature emerged (e.g., Stewart 119-21; Connors, Ede, and Lunsford 5-7; Halloran 176). Exploring the role of the belletristic tradition in rhetoric and of representative individuals such as C. S. Baldwin and the men who held the position of Boylston Professor of Rhetoric at Harvard, the work of these scholars offers insight into the interrelations among rhetoric and literature during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Historians neither of English nor of speech as academic disciplines, however, have traced the relation between rhetoric and literature as it was construed by scholars who were active during this time. The concomitant rise of literary study and fall of rhetoric suggest that historical perceptions of the relation between literary and rhetorical discourse figure in the story of rhetoric's demise. Part of what we might call the life of rhetoric and of literature is the relation that members of the profession perceived between them. As with contemporary discussions on the issue in such texts as Jane Tompkins' Reader in History and Steven Mailloux's Rhetorical Power, we might guess that turn-of-the-century scholars posited rela-

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1992-09-01
DOI
10.1080/07350199209388991
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism discourse analysis public rhetoric literary studies editorial matter
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (18) · 1 in this index

  1. Tompkins Jane (1985)
    Sensational Designs
  2. Mailloux Steven (1989)
    Rhetorical Power
     ↗
  3. Booth Wayne (1961)
    Rhetoric of Fiction
  4. 10.1080/00335632109379350
     ↗
  5. 10.2307/376886
     ↗
Show all 18 →
  1. Booth Wayne C. (1961)
    The Rhetoric of Fiction.
  2. Connors Robert J. (1984)
    Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse.
  3. Corbett (1985)
    The Cornell school of rhetoric
    Rhetoric Review
  4. Halloran S. Michael (1990)
    A Short History of Writing Instruction: From Ancient Greece to Twentieth‐Century America.
  5. 10.2307/377681
     ↗
  6. 10.1080/00335632109379350
     ↗
  7. 10.1080/00335632409379482
     ↗
  8. Howes, Raymond F., ed. 1961.Historical Studies of Rhetoric and Rhetoricians., 369–79. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
  9. Mailloux Steven (1989)
    Rhetorical Power.
     ↗
  10. Stewart Donald C. (1982)
    The Rhetorical Tradition and Modern Writing.
  11. Tompkins Jane P. (1985)
    Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction, 1790–1860.
  12. _____ (1980)
    Reader‐Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post‐Structuralism.
  13. Wichelns Herbert A. (1925)
    Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking in Honor of James Albert Winans.
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025
    Introduction: On the Desirability of Speaking to Others ↗
    Nirvana Tanoukhi; Nicholas Dunn
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument social media race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric literary studies editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Oct 2021
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education two-year college teacher development collaborative writing transfer assessment labor and working conditions multimodality social media online writing instruction multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing gender and writing public rhetoric community literacy affect and writing literary studies editorial matter
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly Oct 2009
    Dancing Attitudes in Wartime: Kenneth Burke and General Semantics ↗
    Jodie Nicotra
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis graduate education race and writing public rhetoric literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  5. College Composition and Communication Feb 2001
    Citizen Critics: Literary Public Spheres ↗
    Dennis A. Lynch; Rosa A. Eberly
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument public rhetoric literary studies editorial matter