Rhetoric Review Mar 1990

Feminist responses to Rogerian argument

Phyllis Lassner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Abstract

(1990). Feminist responses to Rogerian argument. Rhetoric Review: Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 220-232.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1990-03-01
DOI
10.1080/07350199009388895
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Kearney (2009)
    Rogerian Principles and the Writing Classroom: A History of Intention and (Mis)…
    Rhetoric Review
  2. Lynch (1998)
    Rhetorics of proximity: Empathy in temple Grandin and cornel west
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Kraemer (1991)
    Abstracting the bodies of/in academic discourse
    Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Corder (1985)
    Argument as emergence, rhetoric as love
    Rhetoric Review
  2. Ede (1984)
    Is rogerian rhetoric really rogerian?
    Rhetoric Review
  3. Hairston (1982)
    Using Carl Rogers’ communication theories in the composition classroom
    Rhetoric Review
  4. Hairston (1976)
    Carl Rogers's Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric
    College Composition and Communication
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/376958
     ↗
  2. 10.2307/2904147
     ↗
  3. 10.2307/356593
     ↗
  4. 10.2307/377477
     ↗
  5. 10.2307/357019
     ↗
  6. Chase Geoffrey
    10.2307/357812
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  7. 10.2307/356318
     ↗
  8. 10.2307/357635
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →