Abstract

Articles by Richard Fulkerson, Karen Pelz, and Michael Hogan in the first issue of the Journal of Advanced Composition (Spring 1980) all pointed to a serious lack of consistency in the profession's conception of what should be covered in advanced composition courses in college. Professor Pelz, while arguing against what she perceives as another teacher's advocacy of media-centered rather than writing-centered advanced composition courses, advocates the development of a personal style in advanced writing courses, seemingly calling for an emphasis on expressive discourse and self-discovery (A Reply to Medicott: Evaluating Writing, 7-9). Professor Fulkerson (Some Theoretical Speculations on the Advanced Composition Curriculum, 9-12) uses Abrams' and Kinneavy's theories of literary criticism and the aims of discourse to construct two different curricular models for advanced composition programs--one suggesting courses based on the skills required of students as they produce discourse with different aims, the other suggesting synthesizing all four discourse aims in a single advanced composition course. Finally, Professor Hogan (Advanced Composition: A Survey, 21-29) sent questionnaires to 374 advanced composition teachers at 311 schools and found an enormously diverse range of course objectives and plans among the responses that he received. Hogan also found that many advanced composition courses used the same books as freshman writing courses in the same schools. Although rhetoric, Hogan found, dominated the courses of instruction, there did not seem to be any clear or consistent pattern of rhetorical approach in the schools or teachers who reported. Very few respondents, in fact, reflected much attention to types or aims of discourse, as Fulkerson had suggested, in their assignments or plans. Articles such as these reflect the composition profession's general lack

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1983-01-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198309359044
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (25)

  1. Journal of Reading
  2. Psycholinguistics and the Teaching of Reading
  3. The Psychology of Reading
  4. Psycholinguistics and Reading
  5. Understanding Reading
Show all 25 →
  1. 1977.The Philosophy of Composition, 92–137. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  2. Sociolinguistics
  3. 1977.Errors and Expectations, 87New York: Oxford.
  4. The Psychology of Communication
  5. Studies in Long Term Memory
  6. Tulving and Donaldson, eds. 1972.The Organization of Memory, 381–403. New York: Academic Press.
  7. Hirsch, E. D. Jr. 1967.Validity in Interpretation, 24–27. New Haven: Yale.
  8. Betti, Emilio. 1955.Teoria generate della interpretazione, 2 vols, 1343–432. Milan: Giufre.
  9. A Theory of Discourse
  10. 1978.The Reader, the Text, and the Poem, 16Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.
  11. Thought and Language
  12. Language and Learning
  13. The Language and Thought of the Child
  14. The Construction of Reality in the Child
  15. Six Psychological Studies
  16. 1970.Language and Learning, 59–64. Middlesex, England: Penguin Bks.
  17. Teaching the Universe of Discourse
  18. Studies in Cognitive Growth
  19. College English
  20. Journal of Advanced Composition