Chinese Women’s Reproductive Justice and Social Media — Rhetoric & Composition

Technical Communication Quarterly Jul 2021

Chinese Women’s Reproductive Justice and Social Media

Hua Wang Michigan Technological University

Abstract

By utilizing rhetorical analysis with a focus on agency and feminist rhetoric, this article focuses on China’s most popular pregnancy and mothering app – Babytree – to examine how users assume the mantle of technical writers, writing their pregnant and mothering experiences into online narratives and selling them to generate income. This article shows how Chinese women take advantage of the technical affordances of Babytree to share their embodied experiences and, in so doing, respond to and push back against the traditional norms of motherhood and healthcare provision. The women whose experiences are examined here participate in social media as a way to reenter job markets by using their embodied experiences, thus asserting their rhetorical agency politically and economically while implicitly critiquing the traditional situation of contemporary pregnant women and the state of motherhood in China.

Journal: Technical Communication Quarterly
Published: 2021-07-03
DOI: 10.1080/10572252.2021.1930178
Open Access: Closed
Topics: social media

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Agbozo et al. (2025)

Archives, AI, and Technical and Professional Communication

Technical Communication Quarterly
Madson (2024)

Cannabis Risk Communication: A Scoping Review with a Research Agenda

Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

Jones (2016)

Narrative Inquiry in Human-Centered Design

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Koerber (2006)

Rhetorical Agency, Resistance, and the Disciplinary Rhetorics of Breastfeeding

Technical Communication Quarterly

Also cites 22 works outside this index ↓

10.1525/9780520957725

↗
10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8

↗
10.1080/1479142042000332134

↗
10.1016/j.midw.2007.03.001

↗
10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00259.x

↗
10.2471/BLT.11.090399

↗
10.2979/ete.2010.15.2.103

↗
10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.003

↗
10.1016/S0968-8080(10)36523-2

↗
10.1111/1471-0528.12971

↗
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008994

↗
10.1526/003601107782638684

↗
10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

↗
10.1016/j.anr.2012.02.005

↗
10.1023/A:1024049516797

↗
10.1186/1471-2458-10-566

↗
10.1111/soc4.12398

↗
10.1080/07491409.2017.1285839

↗
10.1080/13698575.2015.1127333

↗
10.1080/09589236.2017.1301813

↗
10.36019/9780813591049

↗
10.1525/9780520947610

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →