Optical Solutions: Reception of an NSF-Funded Science Comic Book on the Biology of the Eye

William J. White Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

This article traces the reception of a “science comic book” by various audiences including readers and reviewers after publication as well as grant application review committees vetting the proposed project in its conceptual stage. Specifically, the work is a biology textbook containing comics-style visual explanations couched in the form of an imaginative story interwoven with and supplementing traditional text-based explanations of the same ideas. The analysis uses Genette’s concept of “paratexts” (i.e., a class of speech genres comprising those supplementary texts that contextualize and inform readers’ interpretations of the primary text that they accompany) to examine the rhetoric of the visual in the discourse of science education. This analysis observes that the stigmatization of comics as a medium played some role in how readers, critics, and reviewers responded to the text. The implications of this stigma for cultural conceptions of science and their relationships to other knowledge domains, including the arts and humanities, raise a concern for the mediation of public impressions of science as an institution.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2017-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2017.1285962
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00028533.2007.11821666
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  2. 10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2
  3. 10.1515/sem-2013-0079
  4. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  5. 10.1080/23796529.2015.11674728
  6. 10.1080/23796529.2011.11674686
  7. 10.29333/ojcmt/2368
    Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies  
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511549373
  9. 10.1136/bmj.c863
  10. 10.1187/cbe.10-07-0090
  11. 10.1177/1329878X1415100110
  12. 10.1891/1945-8959.11.2.196
  13. 10.1177/0963662505048197
  14. 10.1177/0963662511403877
  15. 10.1080/00335630902842095
  16. 10.1007/s12052-008-0093-0
  17. 10.1177/1080569909336464
  18. 10.1007/s11165-013-9358-x
  19. 10.1007/BF02016675
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →