Abstract
Abstract In the field of conservation, the distinction between academic research and advocacy appears to be undergoing a shift as the number of PhD-level researchers at conservation advocacy organizations grows. Drawing on my case study of one researcher at a prominent conservation nongovernmental organization (NGO), I have shown how this shift is manifested in the communication of NGO research. My study includes a discourse analysis of this researcher's publications from the forums of both scholarship and advocacy including, as a representation of discourse in the latter forum, gray literature (reports, books, and other texts produced and distributed outside the channels of the academic and publishing industry). I have also drawn on my interviews with this researcher about her publications. My study highlights specific features typical of her rhetoric that result from her occupying a hybridized cultural and professional space where research and advocacy overlap. Notes 1My study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the university where I completed this work. 2All quotes from Brandon are taken from an interview I conducted with her on March 5, 2005. 3Further examples illustrating my points here and elsewhere can be found in CitationLindeman (2006), the larger study that is the basis for this article.