Using portfolios to evaluate service courses as part of an engineering writing program

Cathie Scott ; Carolyn Plumb University of Washington

Abstract

Assessing the efficacy of technical communication service courses is a complex task, yet it is a task that service course providers should embrace as an opportunity to learn more about student and faculty needs and to update and improve curricula. This assessment has become more immediate for many educators because of ABET 2000 (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology), a comprehensive revamping of the way engineering programs are accredited. ABET 2000 criteria require that engineering programs provide evidence of the efficacy of all instruction, including communication. When the new ABET criteria were released, we had already begun a comprehensive evaluation of not only our service courses but also the total writing experience of engineering students at the University of Washington. This paper gives a theoretical rationale for a portfolio evaluation project and describes a directly applicable structure and procedure for such a project.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1999-06-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259909364672
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/358837
  2. 10.1080/00098655.1995.9957242
    Clearing House  
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →