Using portfolios to evaluate service courses as part of an engineering writing program

Cathie Scott ; Carolyn Plumb University of Washington

Abstract

Assessing the efficacy of technical communication service courses is a complex task, yet it is a task that service course providers should embrace as an opportunity to learn more about student and faculty needs and to update and improve curricula. This assessment has become more immediate for many educators because of ABET 2000 (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology), a comprehensive revamping of the way engineering programs are accredited. ABET 2000 criteria require that engineering programs provide evidence of the efficacy of all instruction, including communication. When the new ABET criteria were released, we had already begun a comprehensive evaluation of not only our service courses but also the total writing experience of engineering students at the University of Washington. This paper gives a theoretical rationale for a portfolio evaluation project and describes a directly applicable structure and procedure for such a project.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1999-06-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259909364672
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (20)

  1. Portfolio Assessment at Alverno College.
  2. Portfolio Assessment: A Handbook for Educators.
  3. New Directions in Portfolio Assessment: Reflective Practice, Critical Theory, and Large‐S…
  4. Portfolios: Process and Product.
  5. The Freshman/Sophomore Writing Study: 1989–1991
Show all 20 →
  1. Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education.
  2. GenEd Writing Program Outcomes Assessment Report: ENGL 111G.
    Memorandum to Reed Dasenbrock
  3. Validating Holistic Scoring for Writing Assessment.
  4. Portfolios: Process and Product.
  5. Portfolios: Process and Product.
  6. Assessing Writers’ Knowledge and Processes of Composing.
  7. Process and Portfolios in Writing Instruction
  8. 10.2307/358837
  9. Teachers and Writers
  10. Portfolios: Process and Product.
  11. New Directions in Portfolio Assessment: Reflective Practice, Critical Theory, and Large‐S…
  12. Writing Portfolios: A Bridge from Teaching to Assessment.
  13. 10.1080/00098655.1995.9957242
    Clearing House  
  14. Teaching and Assessing Writing.
  15. Evaluating College Writing Programs.