Abstract

This article examines research literature on educational hypermedia design and divides the literature into two groups, one advocating no author control of the user's path through the material, the other advocating varying degrees of control. The no control researchers’ work is determined to be lacking in audience and goals analyses as well as results evaluation while the researchers advocating control lack grounding in theory.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1995-01-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259509364586
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (26)

  1. Journal of Computer‐Based Instruction
  2. Journal of Computer‐Based Instruction
  3. Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext and the History of Writing
  4. Technical Communication
  5. Atlantic Monthly
Show all 26 →
  1. Multimedia Interface Design
  2. Journal of Computer‐Based Instruction
  3. The Society of Text
  4. Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product & Process
  5. 10.1007/BF02942605
  6. 10.1007/BF00056142
  7. Intellectual Teamwork
  8. Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology
  9. Journal of Computer‐Based Instruction
  10. Journal of Computer‐Based Instruction
  11. Multimedia Interface Design
  12. Hypertext in Context
  13. Journal of Computer‐Based Instruction
  14. Literary Machines. 90.1
  15. Hypertext and Hypermedia
  16. Multimedia Interface Design
  17. The Society of Text
  18. Journal of Computer‐Based Instruction
  19. 10.1037/0022-0663.72.4.525
  20. 10.1145/64789.64992
  21. Multimedia Interface Design